Pirate Ship Mafia II [Concluded]

**El Barto** · 10-15-2012, 20:45

Originally Posted by Zaccino

And received no wills (that's what, 100 gold right there?), and didn't go out stealing each night (that's 5-20 gold each night), so I'm not sure what your point is there.

I only stole once, and established DaveShack's absence while at it.
I actually had to work to get my money, Zaccino, you worked handing it out. I wonder what would have happened if everyone started asking you for gold instead of engaging in regular 'eliminate scum - ignore everything else' mafia mode.

**Zack** · 10-15-2012, 20:47

Originally Posted by El Barto

I only stole once, and established DaveShack's absence while at it.
I actually had to work to get my money, Zaccino, you worked handing it out. I wonder what would have happened if everyone started asking you for gold instead of engaging in regular 'eliminate scum - ignore everything else' mafia mode.

I did hand out quite a bit of gold.

And I worked to recruit people, which got me 60 gold, significantly less than two wills. And, of course, no one payed me to protect them at night.

Not saying you didn't work hard, just pointing out that my advantages aren't as great as they might seem.

**El Barto** · 10-15-2012, 20:50

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

This was a major miscalculation on my part. I thought anyone caught stealing was going to be in serious lynch danger at the very least. Instead, like you said, all it did was exonerate a person and got them the Quartermaster position.

And this is bad because…? There was no rolling of cannonballs, or of heads?

Originally Posted by Zaccino

I did hand out quite a bit of gold.

And I worked to recruit people, which got me 60 gold, significantly less than two wills. And, of course, no one payed me to protect them at night.

*paid

We were a consortium, Zaccino. In that same spirit, me bank be willing to lend ye money for yer next expedition, being as it may, that by chance ye might find it in ye to travel to the Japans and Cathay, and not get marooned there.

**Diana Abnoba** · 10-15-2012, 20:51

Anyone that died only got 50 gold from their wills. Not 100 if both their partners died. So Zack your 60 gold in recruits was more then I sent El Barto from my will.

**Zack** · 10-15-2012, 20:52

Originally Posted by Diana Abnoba

Anyone that died only got 50 gold from their wills. Not 100 if both their partners died. So Zack your 60 gold in recruits was more then I sent El Barto from my will.

2 wills

50 + 50 = 100

100 > 60

**Diana Abnoba** · 10-15-2012, 20:53

Yes, I got 50 from Pizza when he died and El Barto got 50 when I died. (not 100, not both wills)

p.s. and if El Barto died before Pizza, Pizza would have gotten 50 from El Barto.

**Zack** · 10-15-2012, 20:54

I think the guarding gold issue could be solved by simply not revealing the thief.

Yes, I got 50 from Pizza when he died and El Barto got 50 when I died, not 100.

If that was the case, Tak worded it confusingly and/or I misinterpreted it. My bad.

**Montmorency** · 10-15-2012, 20:56

Intentionally lynching someone for something that has nothing to do with scum would require that other thing being more of a threat to the town than the scum, which just isn't going to happen with this gold mechanic

Heh.

**TinCow** · 10-15-2012, 21:19

Originally Posted by Zaccino

I think the guarding gold issue could be solved by simply not revealing the thief.

I don't think so, because even successful stealing can be used to clear someone. You were able to clear Andres because I told you two people had stolen from me on N3 even though I didnt know who they were, and then Andres told you that he had stolen from me on N3. Unless GH gives no information whatsoever on whether someone was stolen from (which might be hard, particularly when it's successful), that action can be used to clear people.