johnhughthom 15:52 10-20-2012
Unfortunately, I'm Jimmy's Grill. I think Lazy cooks his dinner on me, or something. I'd love to be the Codpiece of Whang though. What a knob Lazy must have to need a Codpiece of Whang.
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
Out of curiosity, which pieces of equipment are you two?
Cod Piece of Whang or something disturbing like that.
Jarrema, you are so scummy.
Originally Posted by
Visorslash:
Jarrema, you are so scummy. 
look who is talking
Montmorency 15:55 10-20-2012
This will be silly, but why not:
Soulcrushing Boots - seems obvious
Codpiece of Whang - Crow is telling a humorous tale
Grillpiece of Whatever - the one least-suspected
On how the alignment of each might be deduced from name.
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
This will be silly, but why not:
Soulcrushing Boots - seems obvious
Codpiece of Whang - Crow is telling a humorous tale
Grillpiece of Whatever - the one least-suspected
On how the alignment of each might be deduced from name.
It's Jarrema, john.
Jarrema, you are acting completely unlike your townie self, you are mafia!
johnhughthom 15:57 10-20-2012
Originally Posted by
Jarema:
look who is talking 
Bruce Willis?
Originally Posted by johnhughthom:
Bruce Willis?
No, Roy.
Montmorency 15:58 10-20-2012
"Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willu-u-u-s?"
That's from that show: Family Matters.
Yes, but I am quoting the name Bruce Willis used whilst playing John McClane in Die Hard talking to the police officer.
johnhughthom 16:03 10-20-2012
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
"Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willu-u-u-s?"
That's from that show: Family Matters.
Isn't it Different Strokes?
Originally Posted by johnhughthom:
Isn't it Different Strokes?
No, it's obviously Married with Children. Obviously.
Montmorency 16:06 10-20-2012
No, but I sure would have a "different stroke" to Gary Coleman's fine-

wife, Dana Plato!!
These are poor jokes.
johnhughthom 16:09 10-20-2012
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
These are poor jokes.
Not as poor as Visor's blatant attempt to divert discussion from the matter at hand.
wtf is going on here?
why are we talking about such stuff? I do not ever know half of that
johnhughthom 16:12 10-20-2012
Over here in the west, we have this thing called tv. On tv they show things called shows. We are discussing tv shows. In the west we watch tv instead of drinking vodka all day.
Originally Posted by johnhughthom:
Not as poor as Visor's blatant attempt to divert discussion from the matter at hand.
Quite.
Originally Posted by johnhughthom:
Over here in the west, we have this thing called tv. On tv they show things called shows. We are discussing tv shows. In the west we watch tv instead of drinking vodka all day.
Pretty sure we still do that.
johnhughthom 16:14 10-20-2012
Meh. Unvote; Vote: Jarema
Visor is either town, or has worked out what I was at and deserves to win.
Originally Posted by johnhughthom:
has worked out what I was at
dont understand
shouldnt you base vote on me on your read of me?
johnhughthom 16:34 10-20-2012
What a curious question.
Originally Posted by johnhughthom:
What a curious question.
Indeed.
Montmorency 16:52 10-20-2012
You guys can go ahead and do a spinning roulette of vote changes for the rest of the day now.
johnhughthom 16:54 10-20-2012
I'm planning at least two more. Three if I go down the old self vote route.
Originally Posted by Montmorency:
You guys can go ahead and do a spinning roulette of vote changes for the rest of the day now.
Double Down.
Originally Posted by johnhughthom:
What a curious question.
bleh
I seriously do not understand what you meant by this sentence, and I am surely interested in understanding what it means
johnhughthom 17:23 10-20-2012
We are down to three people, two of us are examining the behaviour of two others, the other is trying to play the other two against each other. Only scum would be basing their vote on the behaviour of one player, a townie would be looking at both, and basing their vote on such.
yes, of course. I was just seeing your vote as based only on examining behavior of Visor
johnhughthom 18:18 10-20-2012
And both your and Visor's votes appear to be based solely on examining each other, with a little fluff about me thrown in for good measure.
good point :)
he just seems so scummy to me, that I have to vote for him
I believe that we are now in situation in which neither me nor Visor will change vote. I think you will decide who is going to be lynched. Therefore, it is important that you examine both sides of your choice
Single Sign On provided by
vBSSO