Results 1 to 30 of 49

Thread: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    I think that golden chevrons Horse Archers, will kill every moving creature :P

    Pretty much like EBO, rules will be decided as it goes on: I hope we'll have a MP campaign in EBII!

  2. #2
    RABO! Member Brave Brave Sir Robin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Assaulting your flanks
    Posts
    1,475

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    And much like IRL, those golden chevroned HA won't be able to do anything against a stone-walled city. :p
    From Frontline for fixing siege towers of death
    x30 From mikepettytw for showing how to edit in game text.
    From Brennus for wit.

  3. #3
    COYATOYPIKC Senior Member Flatout Minigame Champion Arjos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Prisoners upon this rock, flying without wings...
    Posts
    11,087

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brave Brave Sir Robin View Post
    And much like IRL, those golden chevroned HA won't be able to do anything against a stone-walled city. :p
    Oh, they can graze in the fields and wait, there's no rush :D

    Quote Originally Posted by Tanit View Post
    Function is currently turned off to ease modding, but I think its a simple fix to turn back on.
    Awesome!

  4. #4
    Member Member mikepettyrtw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    In the Saka steppe, leading his Yeuzhi Nobles into your ancestral homeland....and eating
    Posts
    63

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    I strongly look forward to an EB MP Campaign. The turn times would be monstrous. It would require hours of free time, and there would have to be a limit on how long battles can be. This however makes a problem for Steppe factions and possiblely of Romans. Whenever I play as either, battles take a very long time. This also applies to a lesser extent the eastern factions in general.
    None the less, those battles would be amazing.
    I am a Nomad steppe Kha-khan and have been since my first Parthia campaign in vanilla some years ago.
    from Brennus being the first entrant into the Nomad Screenshot contest.


    Check out my Playtest of giving hoplite units the phalanx attribute!
    Saka Late Cataphract "Bodyguard Cavalry" Fix (Thanks to Brave Brave Sir Robin)

  5. #5
    Member Member Vilkku92's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Eastern Finland
    Posts
    89

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    How people think Casse would do? My guess is that under player control they would become a real superpower in the west after the Isles have been unified. Their economy just is so strong that they could easily afford some three medium-quality fullstacks and still have money to spare, while the sea would provide them with strong natural barrier against most invasions. As their most likely rivals would either likely have their hands full with other factions (Aedui, Arverni, Lusotann) or have a very weak economy (Sweboz), there wouldn't be much resistance against their expansion that couldn't be overcome by sheer numbers and money. Of course, if the mainland factions could combine their strenght against Casse situation would be much more evenly matched, although they would also have to deal with Rome and Carthage. So many diplomatic options...

  6. #6
    RABO! Member Brave Brave Sir Robin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Assaulting your flanks
    Posts
    1,475

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    It would be hard for the Casse to maintain a fleet against any of the mainland factions if certain houserules were instituted. Namely that ships in ports being blockaded cannot leave without beating back the blockaders. That being said, conservatively it takes about 20 years to gain all of the British Isles at which point you are raking in the money. The Gauls would beat each other bloody and the Sweboz aren't much good at naval invasions either so I think the Casse could come to dominate most of Northern Europe before whoever won the Carthage/Rome duel showed up.
    From Frontline for fixing siege towers of death
    x30 From mikepettytw for showing how to edit in game text.
    From Brennus for wit.

  7. #7
    That other EB guy Member Tanit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    3,953

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    For those who haven't played MP games in M2, the 'who fights which battles?' question is answered by only allowing players to control their armies on their turn. This forces you to be more aggressive during your turn, and to position your armies and fortify your cities in a much more defensive manner towards the end of your turn.



  8. #8

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    Quote Originally Posted by Brave Brave Sir Robin View Post
    It would be hard for the Casse to maintain a fleet against any of the mainland factions if certain houserules were instituted. Namely that ships in ports being blockaded cannot leave without beating back the blockaders. That being said, conservatively it takes about 20 years to gain all of the British Isles at which point you are raking in the money. The Gauls would beat each other bloody and the Sweboz aren't much good at naval invasions either so I think the Casse could come to dominate most of Northern Europe before whoever won the Carthage/Rome duel showed up.
    why would they play conservative in MP tho? wouldn't a player just rush the isles and then turtle up? A casse player can unite the british isles and ireland by 266 BC and then spend the next 10 years turtling up. So by 256 BC they will be very powerful and ready to mount an invasion of Gaul (and probably succeed)

  9. #9

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    Quote Originally Posted by Vilkku92 View Post
    How people think Casse would do? My guess is that under player control they would become a real superpower in the west after the Isles have been unified. Their economy just is so strong that they could easily afford some three medium-quality fullstacks and still have money to spare, while the sea would provide them with strong natural barrier against most invasions. As their most likely rivals would either likely have their hands full with other factions (Aedui, Arverni, Lusotann) or have a very weak economy (Sweboz), there wouldn't be much resistance against their expansion that couldn't be overcome by sheer numbers and money. Of course, if the mainland factions could combine their strenght against Casse situation would be much more evenly matched, although they would also have to deal with Rome and Carthage. So many diplomatic options...
    I'd be willing to play Casse historically and act as referee for the game. I'd play Casse like I do in single player campaign - turtle, remain at peace with the Eleutheroi as long as possible, focus on building up my home city. In my Casse SP campaign, it's 242 BCE, and I've yet to conquer a single town.

  10. #10
    Arrogant Ashigaru Moderator Ludens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,063
    Blog Entries
    1

    Lightbulb Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    Yes, once the Casse unify the British Isles, they'll become the dominant economic power of the West. If the Casse player is skilled at diplomacy, he can probably acquire parts of Gaul as well without alienating his allies.

    On the other hand, I think the Casse won't do as well in combat against other human players. Maybe an MP player will correct me on this; but the Casse lack heavy cavalry, and their heavy infantry is either unarmoured or elite (expensive) and small in number. Against the A.I. you can make due with lighter units, but against human players it's a whole different story.

    The lack of cavalry can be corrected by conquering a Belgian province (Remi Mairepos), but it will take some time to get the necessary infrastructure and it forces the Casse to become involved on the mainland, thus risking war and loss of trade-income.
    Looking for a good read? Visit the Library!

  11. #11
    That other EB guy Member Tanit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    3,953

    Default Re: How do you think a hypothetical Multiplayer EB campaign would go?

    Quote Originally Posted by Arjos View Post
    I think that golden chevrons Horse Archers, will kill every moving creature :P

    Pretty much like EBO, rules will be decided as it goes on: I hope we'll have a MP campaign in EBII!
    Function is currently turned off to ease modding, but I think its a simple fix to turn back on.



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO