Academy of Elemental Magic [Concluded]

[seireikhaan]

Or just taking a minute to go, "He has been in this game, this game, and this game," without linking them. But hey - that's cool. Evidently you have 5+ minutes to argue with me, but not 1 minute to tell me what rounds he has been in that you have played with him in. Guess you really don't like the idea of me proving you wrong.

Also... provide proof that he has been lurking? Are we looking at the same game thread? The proof is already all right here, mah man. He posts on Day 1 with a big RP post. I observe Arjos and Autolycus give him items and say one of them is probably scum with him - this is basically just a gut read at this point (also, ironically, Arjos is now voting for me). Not counting pre-game posts (which would be 1/3 of his posts if I did count them), he has made a grandiose total of four posts. Missing a day phase? Hardly, bro - it's Day 3.

Once again- it's day 3. You hardly waited for the phase to begin to declare him a "lurker" when lurking in itself implies inactivity over several rounds. For the average player in this game, he was fine round 1.

Believe? Nah - let's show.

In page 4 of Hey, Nobody is Hosting This Large Mafia he, as town, makes more posts on Day 1 than he has in this entire thread so far.

In Netherworld III: Final Judgment he, as town, had made seven posts by Day 3 and didn't make any sort of big roleplaying posts.

This is a quote from Andres himself in Sigurd Mafia:

For the record, Andres was entirely anti-town in N3. He was part of a serial killing pair. I should know, I hosted it.

My friend, even Andres is saying that Andres isn't being Andres.

A lot of rounds were difficult to meta-analyze either because I couldn't find his affiliation (you guys seem to hide the affiliation of people really well here... not updating it in the OP, not revealing it on death, and occasionally not showing it in the end thread, either), or because he wouldn't have gotten his role or was out of town for extended periods of the round. On the plus side, my extensive meta analysis also brought me across this most excellent picture:

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

Could somebody name (you don't even have to link) a round where he has been scum in? Every round I saw he was town in - and it would help a lot to get a feel for his scum meta as comparison.



Well, there is typically only one other site I play mafia at - and everyone there knows me anyway, so it's to be expected that I am like this. So... your principle is to vote for people who you disagree with, who vote for people in the "A Team", who act aggressive in their scumhunting, and/or who drop "you're pro" lines, regardless of their affiliation - which you'll refuse to actually take the time to look into because football, yet don't offer to look into things on Monday, either. So in summary, you're sticking to a lynch that doesn't make sense just because you don't like me when, with a little bit of effort and research, you could easily see that this is always how I act as town; then you're using "I have principles" as an excuse to hide behind said lynch. Maybe you, Sir, need to rethink your town strategy, as well. In my realm, we actually try to lynch people we find scummy, not just lynch people we dislike.

Afaik, the last time that Andres was scum was, in fact N3, that one game you thought he was town. And the principles I want you lynched for are: A) The hyper-sensitive response to 2 votes in a game where lynch isn't even auto-death, and B) The so pro remark.