We have a very clear situation here. ATPG claims that he scanned edse and that edse showed up as "utterly corrupted." The rules clearly state that this is a very high level of corruption and it is apparently a special state that avoids the usual numbers. edse, on the other hand, claims he has 1 corruption. One of these two people are lying, which means we have caught a scum. This is a pretty standard situation. When someone reveals a guilty investigation result, the proper course of action is to lynch the accused (in this case, edse). If the lynch then turns out to be wrong, you lynch the accuser (in this case, ATPG). Mafia 101. In any case, do any of you really think that scum-ATPG would fabricate a non-ambiguous investigation result in a game where the guilt or innocence of players is immediately disclosed upon their death?