Quote Originally Posted by Montmorency View Post
You're missing the point.
You'r missing mine. Don't accuse me of wanting to kick everybody out, as you then brush me off as you'r everyday EDL thug or whatever.


What are you basing this on? And how about third, and on?
We can see the effects of second gen immigration already. About third generation, I don't know? Maybe things have worked itself out, maybe we have created a new social class. Most seem to point to the latter as for now, but neither your OR I can say anything about third gen and on. My point is however, why take the risk? I mean, why have a social experiment that could wreck the country?

So I bounce this back, WHY should we continue accepting as much as we do from the countries we do, when all data at the time being - point to it having a negative effect on the country?

As I said, it's a MAJOR social experiment with unforeseeable consequences, why do you feel like risking it?


You still haven't demonstrated long-term economic harm.
Uh, have a look at, say, the PISA test results over the last decades. Sweden is in free fall, most Swedes just haven't realized it yet.


Going by the Wiki, it's more like 0.1%. Where did you get that figure from again? Anyway, you seem to be conflating "immigrant" with "poor, black, Muslim". The majority of your immigrants remain European.
I don't get my sources from wiki.

http://www.migrationsverket.se/downl...7980/tabs1.pdf

The trend is going up rather than down, as you can see.


Ah, so ethnic Swedes never rape brown women? Where did you learn this?
I seriously start to question your reading comprehension. Re-read what I wrote and then consider whether your argument make sense or not...



There are two main ways of looking at it. The first is that these Muslim women are repressed and wouldn't typically report non-consensual sexual behavior on the part of spouses or relatives. The second is that the Muslims - especially black ones - just can't wait to get at the white women. You honestly don't find anything funny about the second interpretation?
Yes I do. So can I offer a third perspective or do you somehow think the discussion should be limited to the two perspectives you present?

Moreover, assault rapes: are you referring to Sweden or Norway here? After all, if Sweden is anything like Norway in this respect, then immigrant assault rapes aren't a huge problem.
I think I seem to have answered this... Even in DAMN big letters. This size on the letters, even. I am of course referring to Sweden, topic title should give a hint if nothing else. And as mentioned in those big letters, rape isn't my main concern. With that said, I think it's important to be respectful and don't neglect the victims by brushing it off as unimportant.

Being raped is bad. Being gang raped by a bunch of Negroes is worse.

So, it's all about immigration and has nothing to do with Sweden's economic struggles in the 90s?
Oh, we sailed through that quite nicely to be honest, and implemented strategies that has helped us loads in this latest crisis. That's why we are still floating, but with that said, we do have a BIG leak.