A group has to be non-political to get tax breaks, right?You're right in that the issue of political groups trying to disguise themselves and take advantage of tax loopholes is bad and complex.
What's not complicated is that the groups targeted were Obama's obvious political opponents, perhaps even some of the same groups that fund a lot of the right wing scaremongering. Executive subversion, however well-meaning, is very straightforward. People should not tolerate it.
So.... If they're political enemies of Obama, doesn't that make the IRS right in their inquiries?
How can you say that a political group should get benefits reserved for non-political groups?
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Bookmarks