Results 1 to 30 of 36

Thread: Gun Control

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Gun Control

    I've just sent this to my Representative. I wrote it when I got home. What do you think? I think it will go a long way to reduce gun crime rates over the next 10 years AND help avoid many mass-shootings. It would also expand the rights of sane, law abiding citizens, with other sane, law abiding citizens living in their home to own the type of guns that it is their civic duty to own and protect.

    National High Capacity WeaponRegulation

    A balanced approach which protects therights of the citizen in all areas.


    I.NICS
    NICS check as currently used is required at time of purchase for all firearms sales. Federal, State and local government will not keep records of passed background checks longer than 48 hours, but FFL's will be required to keep a copy on hand in the case of a warranted search. Private sales will also require an NICS check, but the feefor such check is not to exceed $5 per.

    II.Weapon Type Classes
    Class 3 - consists of select fire rifles, shotguns and pistols.
    Class 2- all semi-automatic rifles & shotguns with a detachable magazine and a capacity greater than 7 rounds. Includes all pistol types
    Class 1 - consists of all other rifles and shotguns


    Requirements for class ownership:


    Class 1 weapons will be regulated only by NICS background check at time of purchase. These items can be owned by all citizens and lawful residents over 18 using Federal or State government issued picture ID except forviolent or gun related felons, and people with a history ofpsychotic mental illness and/or court ordered in-patient mental health treatment within the past 8 years.

    Class 2 weapons will be regulated by a 3-6 month initial mental health background check with in-person interview carried out by the State, County or Municipal government in which you reside. This license will renew every 5 years with updated NICS check which can be retained by NICS. Individuals will be issued a picture ID card titled “Class 2”which will be required in order to buy the aforementioned class 2 firearms. Individual NICS checks will also be required with each purchase. These ID's are to be issued on a “shall issue” basis,barring any serious criminal or mental health concerns including: inpatient mental health treatment within the past 10 years, out-patient mental health treatment within the past 5 years, felony conviction, among others.

    Class 3 weapons will be issued only to Law Enforcement, Military and qualifying FFL's on a “may issue” basis.



    1. Safe Requirements

    For individuals who are themselves licensed Class 2 living in the home of someone who is specifically ineligible for a Class 2 license (determined by the initial interview and subsequent renewals) an initial “safe endorsement” is required prior to purchase of a firearm. This is a one time endorsement and can be added by the FFL upon sale of thesafe, or by County/State government upon inspection of the safe.


    Addendum:

    Pre-Emption Clause
    Although State, County and Municipal licensing authorities may usesome discretion in determining barring circumstances for Class 2 and 3 licensing, no law shall be construed to substantially restrict or expand the rights beyond this law. State and local government are still able to regulate concealed and open carry laws. This law does not address this issue on a National basis at present.


    Saleswithout an NICS background check
    Sales of Class 1 weapons, without using an NICS background check, are Class B misdemeanors, except: this requirement will not apply totransactions within immediate family (husband, wife, son, daughter). Sales performed, knowingly or unknowingly, to individuals who are barred from ownership will be considered a Class E felony.

    Serial Records
    Serialized records of make and model will be kept only in relation to the FFL who stores or has sold the item. The make and model will be retained indefinitely by the FFL in connection with the purchasee, but will be demanded by the government only upon warranted search. This is to prevent linking the serial number of each weapon with the owner directly, and will create a buffer by which a regulated warranting process will be required for records. This restriction will not apply to Class 3 weapons which must be serialized and a record will exist in a central database administered by Municipal, County, State, or Federal agencies.

    Version 2.0
    EDIT: in the document, the spacing looks good
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 01-18-2013 at 15:56.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  2. #2
    Iron Fist Senior Member Husar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    15,617

    Default Re: Gun Control

    I think your space key is broken.

    As for the content, it won't help, there are already 999,999,999.99 guns in the USA and they won't go away and criminals can get illegal guns all the time anyway. Despite that, any law that doesn't make criminal gun ownership go away within the current election cycle is completely useless because seriously, who wants to make the world a better place for today's spoiled brats children?
    Oh and you focus on mental health checks, but what exactly makes a person mentally ill and how are all murderers mentally ill? Is there even any research as to how and why murders are mentally ill and how to find out before they kill people? Will socially isolated people be called mentally ill from now on?


    "Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu

  3. #3
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Got a perfect solution, keep easily conceiled small arms lockep up at the shooting range, and allow larger arms like shotguns and assault rifles to be held legally at home, in bigger cities at least. Wrongdoers will be outgunned if they enter private property, and you can't carry around a weapon you can't conceal without someone noticing. Everybody happy. Ok it's not perfect but it's better imho.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Senior Member Idaho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2000
    Location
    Exeter, England
    Posts
    6,542

    Default Re: Gun Control

    I'm guessing that the whole home invasion successfully defended by plucky gun owners is actually a real rarity. You are probably a thousand times more likely to be killed in a car crash.
    "The republicans will draft your kids, poison the air and water, take away your social security and burn down black churches if elected." Gawain of Orkney

  5. #5
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: Gun Control

    I was trying to be moderate. I am personally in favor of select-fire weapons being in the hands of everyone including all but the most dangerous criminals, so long as everyone is armed to the teeth. We can meet near the middle if we try. You want nobody to have any guns, I want everyone to have all of the guns. I place a high value on the second amendment. Any changes in gun ownership barring the majority of violent felons and the seriously or dangerously mentally ill is a long haul strategy. If you want anything in the short term with the Second Amendment still in the Constitution, you've are barking up the wrong tree; unless you just want them to dismiss stare decisis and interpret any individual right to arms for self defense related or unrelated to the militia out. The problem is that this thought process - of interpreting out the inconvenient - works for all of the amendments.

    There is no reason to ban "high capacity semi-auto" guns when we havn't even tried to create a permitting process for them. Permitting works in the long term . Suffolk county, where I live, has pistol permits and very low handgun crime. It is extremely difficult to buy a handgun in Suffolk without a fairly irritating degree of red tape. If the entire country had this process for pistols and high capacity rifles, gun crime efficacy would be way down. We know that handguns are protected by the second amendment and we have created a permitting process for them in some areas. Handguns are involved in somewhere near 93% of all gun homicides. Why the all or nothing strategy with what is commonly and unreasonably referred to as "assault weapons"?

    The idea that the radical right to bear arms, institutionalized in the U.S. and a few other countries, can be combined at this point with an expansive amount of background protections is a turning point. We should not be banning weapons, but rather making sure that the process is just onerous enough to bar dangers to society. We can try something new and American and reduce crime rates, without destroying our rights to arms.

    EDIT: I cleaned up the spacing and added another part to the Addendum regarding serialization and record keeping.
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 01-18-2013 at 14:32.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  6. #6
    Stranger in a strange land Moderator Hooahguy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The Fortress
    Posts
    11,852

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Isnt there another thread about this topic?

    Getting tired of this topic.
    On the Path to the Streets of Gold: a Suebi AAR
    Visited:
    A man who casts no shadow has no soul.
    Hvil i fred HoreTore

  7. #7
    master of the pwniverse Member Fragony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    The EUSSR
    Posts
    30,680

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Quote Originally Posted by Idaho View Post
    I'm guessing that the whole home invasion successfully defended by plucky gun owners is actually a real rarity. You are probably a thousand times more likely to be killed in a car crash.
    Sure, but think of it. Americans will never give up their guns, I agree with them but that's not the point. If you leave the right to have shotguns and assault rifles intact as long as it is private property, but ban having smaller weapons in private property, you have a win-win situation. It should please everyone when done right. People who practise it as a sport have their pistols firmly locked down at the shooting range, and people who have it for protection have bigger guns. It would solve a lot.

  8. #8
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Mandating that people keep handguns at home WILL DO NOTHING to deter crime. Let them carry if they own it and prove competent to carry (via some safety course standard). The people who are crazy are going to carry anyway, especially if it was already at home. Plus, handguns are protected by the second amendment. Don't believe me? Ask the DC v Heller decision.

    (3) The handgun ban and the trigger-lock requirement (as applied to self-defense) violate the Second Amendment. The District’s total ban on handgun possession in the home amounts to a prohibition on an entire class of “arms” that Americans overwhelmingly choose for the lawful purpose of self-defense. Under any of the standards of scrutiny the Court has applied to enumerated constitutional rights, this prohibition – in the place where the importance of the lawful defense of self, family, and property is most acute – would fail constitutional muster. Similarly, the requirement that any lawful firearm in the home be disassembled or bound by a trigger lock makes it impossible for citizens to use arms for the core lawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional. Because Heller conceded at oral argument that the D. C. licensing law is permissible if it is not enforced arbitrarily and capriciously, the Court assumes that a license will satisfy his prayer for relief and does not address the licensing requirement. Assuming he is not disqualified from exercising Second Amendment rights, the District must permit Heller to register his handgun and must issue him a license to carry it in the home. Pp. 56–64.
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 01-18-2013 at 15:18.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  9. #9
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Quote Originally Posted by ICantSpellDawg View Post
    I've just sent this to my Representative. I wrote it when I got home. What do you think? I think it will go a long way to reduce gun crime rates over the next 10 years AND help avoid many mass-shootings. It would also expand the rights of sane, law abiding citizens, with other sane, law abiding citizens living in their home to own the type of guns that it is their civic duty to own and protect.
    Gun ownership has is way up in the last 20 years and violent crime has gone way down. One could reasonably argue that there is no gun problem that needs addressed by new legislation.

    How about a baby step before the big leap forward that you're suggesting? Cut down on straw purchases and gun smuggling by limiting gun purchases per month. Just to throw out a number... let's say 6 guns a month. Unless you're equipping a militia, that should suffice. No more buying 30 pistols a week and driving them to the Mexican border.

    What would this do to address scenarios like the Sandy Hook massacre? Nothing. No reasonable laws would.
    Last edited by Xiahou; 01-19-2013 at 01:23.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  10. #10
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Gun ownership has is way up in the last 20 years and violent crime has gone way down. One could reasonably argue that there is no gun problem that needs addressed by new legislation.
    But that kinda glosses over other factors that may have contributed to the decrease in violent crime.
    This space intentionally left blank.

  11. #11
    The very model of a modern Moderator Xiahou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    in the cloud.
    Posts
    9,007

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Quote Originally Posted by Hax View Post
    But that kinda glosses over other factors that may have contributed to the decrease in violent crime.
    That's besides the point. I wasn't arguing a direct causal relationship so much as pointing out that more guns do NOT equal more violent crime.

    Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla
    Why not one gun a month?

    Six a month is a maximum of 72 a year.

    Why not six a year? Realistically, who needs more than six guns?
    I'm not going to try to decide how many guns a person "needs". What I think we should do is place a limit on gun purchases that is just low enough to stop someone from making a living off of being a straw purchaser.
    "Don't believe everything you read online."
    -Abraham Lincoln

  12. #12
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: Gun Control

    The rally in Albany brought approx 2000 people. It was impressive and freezing. I heard that turnout around the country was pretty good. I live in NY, I have had luck pushing this plan on the liberals in my state. My plan is to have them approach us with this plan, rather than have us approach them with it. If this is their starting point, compromise is a much better scenario. If I were the G.O.P. House and a tightly locked Senate, I wouldn't give an inch. We will wait until we have either both houses or House the executive. At that point we'll be able to push for a national carry law along with any reforms and the middle ground will be decided more on our terms.

    Here is a neat graph, illustrating the drop in homicides over the past few years while the ownership of high powered firearms has hit record levels. Notice the level of deaths caused by rifles and what direction they are moving in spite of record numbers of AR/AK buyers.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	murderrates1.jpg 
Views:	79 
Size:	354.8 KB 
ID:	8431
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 01-20-2013 at 05:53.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  13. #13

    Default Re: Gun Control

    That's besides the point. I wasn't arguing a direct causal relationship so much as pointing out that more guns do NOT equal more violent crime.
    The latter implies the former, so that's a bit dishonest. But this relationship certainly doesn't necessarily imply that gun-quantity does not affect the level of violent crime. Perhaps without so many guns the drop in crime rates would have been even greater? Prove me wrong.

    Quote Originally Posted by ICantSpellDawg
    Here is a neat graph, illustrating the drop in homicides over the past few years while the ownership of high powered firearms has hit record levels. Notice the level of deaths caused by rifles and what direction they are moving in spite of record numbers of AR/AK buyers.
    That chart is only for death by murder; suicide, homicide of accident/manslaughter... not reflected. Looking it up for myself:

    Half of suicide by gun, out of up to 40000-a-year.

    CDC lists 19400 by gun-suicide in 2010, so my approximation of 20K is about corect.

    CDC further lists 600 killed (in 2010) by "accidental discharge" (an admittedly small figure), and 11000 gun "homicides" - I assume this means something over 2000 killed through manslaughter-by-gun, subtracting from the FBI figures for murder that you put up.

    CDC: 31,672 firearm deaths in 2010. Suicide + homicide + accidental discharge and it adds up.

    850 deaths by accidental discharge in 2011 - a leap of over 40%. Interesting... Also in 2011, a near-2% rise in suicide-death by firearm.

    In 2011 (still above link), 32000+ accidental injuries by firearm.

    As for historical trends on suicide, injury, and accidental-discharge death - someone else can do that; I've done my part.
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



  14. #14
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    That's besides the point. I wasn't arguing a direct causal relationship so much as pointing out that more guns do NOT equal more violent crime.
    But they do equal more fatal assaults.

    [/quote]I'm not going to try to decide how many guns a person "needs". What I think we should do is place a limit on gun purchases that is just low enough to stop someone from making a living off of being a straw purchaser.[/QUOTE]

    1 rifle, .30 for hunting and whatever else.

    1 rimfire rifle for small game

    1 9-10 mm for rats and racoons at close range in the barn

    1 .45 handgun for when you're out hunting and you need something you can pull on a big cat or a bear with decent stopping power at close range

    1 double barreled shotgun for hunting birds, rabbits, what have you.

    1 pump action shotgun for home defense.

    As far as I can see - if someone broke ind stole ALL my guns I'd only need six purchases to acquire an arsenal for every occasion.

    As far as I can see, more than those six is simply redundant - so I'm quite happy saying you only need six guns a year. Howbeit - the real issue is unrestricted purchases, here you have to apply for every gun you want to buy and say why you want it
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

  15. #15
    Forum Lurker Member Sir Moody's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    United kingdom
    Posts
    1,630

    Default Re: Gun Control

    The problem with claiming there is a link between increased gun ownership and decreased homicides is one of global trends.

    Most of the Western World has seen a decrease in Homicides in the last 20 years - Most of the Western world has at least some form of Gun Control - therefore guns probably don't factor into it much - its a cultural shift made up of numerous factors

    remember the greatest phrase in all statistical discussions - Correlation does not equal Causation

    Member thankful for this post:



  16. #16
    Voluntary Suspension Voluntary Suspension Philippus Flavius Homovallumus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Isca
    Posts
    13,477

    Default Re: Gun Control

    Quote Originally Posted by Xiahou View Post
    Gun ownership has is way up in the last 20 years and violent crime has gone way down. One could reasonably argue that there is no gun problem that needs addressed by new legislation.

    How about a baby step before the big leap forward that you're suggesting? Cut down on straw purchases and gun smuggling by limiting gun purchases per month. Just to throw out a number... let's say 6 guns a month. Unless you're equipping a militia, that should suffice. No more buying 30 pistols a week and driving them to the Mexican border.

    What would this do to address scenarios like the Sandy Hook massacre? Nothing. No reasonable laws would.

    Why not one gun a month?

    Six a month is a maximum of 72 a year.

    Why not six a year? Realistically, who needs more than six guns?

    The US really needs to come down on these vigilante groups trying to set themselves up as militias too - they're a public danger by their very nature.
    "If it wears trousers generally I don't pay attention."

    [IMG]https://img197.imageshack.us/img197/4917/logoromans23pd.jpg[/IMG]

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO