Results 1 to 30 of 179

Thread: Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    it was originally on the site please read up sir, he is know dead.

    "His list of demands, posted at savetheplanetprotest.com, is a teabagger’s wet dream of enviro idiocy."

    the original quote is from his list of demands,from his site savetheplanet that he created.

    polutent
    you are desperate fro sure know,i give example in op as it being false claim, i give definition, all you ever have is claims its false. or it could be you still dont get what i said in op. I said c02 is not a polutant.

    you said
    " Remove the errors and clean it up"
    I would if you could show me any, all you have given is claim of a quote you have been shown is legit over and over, and what apears to be a misunderstanding of c02 and pollutants. I think me and you both know your running because you still cant back up your original claims of errors and false quotes. Sometimes it ok to admit if you jumped the gun.
    lol.

    You wrote:

    Quote Originally Posted by You
    carbon dioxide is not a pollutant
    To which the answer is: yes it bloody is. Laughable mistake when the subject is natural science. In fact, if co2 isn't counted as a pollutant, nothing can be.

    The definition of poison fourth graders learn(the poison is in the dosage) is well worth to keep in mind.

    As for the false quote:

    It still astounds me that you cannot understand how to quote. A quote which cannot be checked is worthless, and the one who gives a quote must include the information the reader needs to check the validity of the quote. Failure to do so results in a false quote. The quote, as you have given it, simply does not exist. If you are sure of its existence and validity, you must give the reader the resources needed to confirm it.

    Basic academia 101.

    And as I've said previously, the OP is so full of errors that I simply can't bother pointing them all out. A little effort on your part to iron out the worst ones is the minimum one can expect, really.
    Last edited by HoreTore; 04-08-2013 at 15:41.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO