Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

Thread: Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

  1. total relism's Avatar

    total relism said:

    Default Re: Resting the green dragon/the dangers of radical environmentalism.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lemur View Post
    That's not an issue, use Wayback Machine and find the original quote.

    Alternatively:

    1. Admit it's a fabrication, or
    2. Declare that you can't be bothered.

    so let me see if i am right, i need to go to a webpage,that appears to be not run anymore [as the creator id dead] that is constaley confirmed to have a quote from a person ,show in multiple media reporting, to convince you? I could than edit my op, and say it never said anything about global warming. than multiple people would quote from my original op [used later] showing it did, but i kill myself so it cant be reedited. Than you would have to claim i never said it as it can be produced from my original op.

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    lol.

    You wrote:



    To which the answer is: yes it bloody is. Laughable mistake when the subject is natural science. In fact, if co2 isn't counted as a pollutant, nothing can be.

    The definition of poison fourth graders learn(the poison is in the dosage) is well worth to keep in mind.

    As for the false quote:

    It still astounds me that you cannot understand how to quote. A quote which cannot be checked is worthless, and the one who gives a quote must include the information the reader needs to check the validity of the quote. Failure to do so results in a false quote. The quote, as you have given it, simply does not exist. If you are sure of its existence and validity, you must give the reader the resources needed to confirm it.

    Basic academia 101.

    posion
    as i said in post 13

    " Oxygen could be considered a poison if to much."

    but the lie/false info that is given is,no matter how much, any released c02 is a pollutant. Hopefully you know understand,that is why it was labeled under the lies section.

    I thought you may have been misunderstanding it.


    as i said,hes dead,lol. But you can deny what everyone else knows [maybe big conspiracy against radicals, maybe he never held people hostage,maybe he never wrote down his demands].

    im going to copy paste my response above
    so let me see if i am right, i need to go to a webpage,that appears to be not run anymore [as the creator id dead] that is constaley confirmed to have a quote from a person ,show in multiple media reporting, to convince you? I could than edit my op, and say it never said anything about global warming. than multiple people would quote from my original op [used later] showing it did, but i kill myself so it cant be reedited. Than you would have to claim i never said it as it can be produced from my original op.


    and they say there are climate change deniers,i wish this type of skeptical thinking was applied to their theory of man made global warming. Anyone who is not in denial, google James J. Lee radical environmentalist.
    Last edited by total relism; 04-08-2013 at 15:57.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1
     
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO