If you are going to insist on the morally outraged act I will explain it simply for you.

I made a fairly long post (well at least compared to your reply) and the only thing you seemed to pick out of my post was my definition of them as soldiers I then first talked about how I already called them terrorists and then said how it only seems to be how I defined the men that you had a problem with.

I then mentioned how I see very little difference between the definitions mentioning that both can be good or bad. You had a problem (seemingly) with how I defined them and then are shocked some discussion about the definitions may occur?

I am sorry but your moral outrage does not wash with me, if you think I am glorifying or celebrating these people then think again. Not really a fan of anyone dying to be honest.

Reply