Results 1 to 30 of 1996

Thread: Random Thoughts Thread

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #22

    Default Re: Random Thoughts Thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Vincent Butler View Post
    If the plural of goose is geese, is the plural of moose, meese?
    Quote Originally Posted by Csargo View Post
    https://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/...l-moose-meese/

    tl;dr version is it entered the English language a few hundred years after the Old English changes of words like goose/geese.
    Quote Originally Posted by Husar View Post
    A question I've had for years:

    If the plural of mouse is mice, why isn't the plural of house hice?
    From the OED:

    OE. gós (pl. gés)
    Narragansett moos (= Abenaki mus, Penobscot muns)

    Moose is not a native English, or even (Indo)European word.


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Vowel_Shift

    OE. mús fem. (pl. mýs)
    The word for mouse used to sound like modern "moose", before u → ɑʊ.

    Same with the word for house: OE. hús

    The plural was in OE. hús, in 12th c. husas, huses, from 14th c. houses; also in various writers from c 1550, and still dialectally, housen, which is sometimes collective.
    So why don't "mouse" and "house" have the same plural?

    Well, in the case of the modern computer peripheral they can.

    But actually in Old English the plurals of the two words were different to start, as you see above.

    For "mice" it seems to go back to Proto-Germanic:

    As a specific instance of this, in prehistoric Old English, a certain class of nouns was marked by an /i/ suffix in the (nominative) plural, but had no suffix in the (nominative) singular. A word like /muːs/ "mouse", for example, had a plural /muːsi/ "mice". After umlaut, the plural became pronounced [myːsi], where the long back vowel /uː/ was fronted, producing a new subphonemic front-rounded vowel [yː], which serves as a secondary indicator of plurality. Subsequent loss of final /i/, however, made /yː/ a phoneme and the primary indicator of plurality, leading to a distinction between /muːs/ "mouse" and /myːs/ "mice". In this case, the lost sound /i/ left a trace in the presence of /yː/; or equivalently, the distinction between singular and plural, formerly expressed through a suffix /i/, has been re-expressed using a different feature, namely the front-back distinction of the main vowel. This distinction survives in the modern forms "mouse" /maʊs/ and "mice" /maɪs/, although the specifics have been modified by the Great Vowel Shift.
    Then what about house? As you see above, in Old English the singular and plural were identical. It's just that over time people added on the generic "-(e/a)s" English plural to help differentiate.
    Last edited by Montmorency; 11-19-2017 at 01:01.
    Vitiate Man.

    History repeats the old conceits
    The glib replies, the same defeats


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 



Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO