Exactly. A language does not grow or adapt if people do not invent new words to explain concept that the language currently has no means of expressing.
I did a google search and all I found were references to the historical context and tv shows made about it. Why would I want to use a term with that much baggage that is tied down to such a specific definition of 'normal' when my point was broad expression? I believe my term is far more practical and robust, TYVM.
Bookmarks