I think it is implied in your argument that opposing scientific advancement is a bad thing. Certainly, I've never heard you praise the church for it!
As for your question - I don't know, the moon landings? Here's a better idea, since you are the one making positive claims and feeling confident enough to apply these to every Christian denomination and every scientific discovery, how about you provide the wealth of evidence you must have to support such absolute claims?
I shall hold you to this in future.
You stated the churches opposition in absolute, rather than general terms. You went to the trouble to point out that all denominations were guilty of this with all scientific progress. Don't backtrack.
Um... while you believe that my conclusion might be the result of a lack of knowledge, it is not necessarily so.
I pointed out a clear and outright error on your part - something you have been unable to do in return, despite your attempt at a 'comeback'.
Yes, Calvinism in particular, and the Reformation more generally, did complement a resurgence in natural philosophy. But the relationship may have been one of mutual reinforcement, rathern than one-way causation - Calvin had studied philosophy and law and was well acquainted with humanism before his conversion.
Bookmarks