responding to common objections to bible part 5

[total relism]

Then you have not only failed to properly represent the argument of the other side, you have also completely failed to grasp their argument.

As such there is absolutely no grounds for a discussion.

as sated, there argument does not deal with what i said, feel free to post here if you disagree, or your misrepresenting my side. In fact you ask the same question and agree with my on one of your own threads
Why is it wrong to take pleasure in the misfortunes of others?
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...ers&highlight=

you throughout agree with me, no absolute morals or right and wrong, you even agree with a poster saying just what my thread was on last post.


Btw could you show me a thread you have represented the other side in your op?. reading through your recent thread started, i would say gives many examples of you not representing the other side.

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/searc...earchid=106568


i read first 4 and zimmerman and woman seem the perfect example as well as Dyslexia of not doing what you claim i should do. In fact reading more it becomes very clear this is your practice,i dont mind at all, but you should apply your own ideas to yourself before criticizing others. Also my post assume the others arguments, god sent plagues that killed people/babies so he is evil, that is a argument, god unjustly punishes people for there fathers sin,that is a argument, i give the counter etc.



i think its clear your being a vague as possible and avoiding a discussion on any topic given.