There is no good reason to expose kids to sex prematurely. None.Originally Posted by HoreTore
Re: Newer generations and the internet.
There is no good reason to expose kids to sex prematurely. None.
"And if the people raise a great howl against my barbarity and cruelty, I will answer that war is war and not popularity seeking. If they want peace, they and their relatives must stop the war." - William Tecumseh Sherman
“The market, like the Lord, helps those who help themselves. But unlike the Lord, the market does not forgive those who know not what they do.” - Warren Buffett
Re: Newer generations and the internet.
Depends on how you look at it, I see sex as a positive thing, not as a vice.
Re: Newer generations and the internet.
Maybe the both of y'all have a different idea of what "kid" means. Define that, first.
This space intentionally left blank.
Re: Newer generations and the internet.
Not sure. But, somewhere 12+ probably. For me as a 36 old twelve is of course unacceptable, but I don't have a problem untill 18 with a twelve year old or so. After that it kinda starts to feel wrong, but I still wouldn't really have problem with it, certainly wouldn't act on it but turn a blind eye. I don't really know the red line.
Re: Newer generations and the internet.
I might be reading you wrong, but are you saying you don't see a problem with a 17 year-old sleeping with a 12 year-old?!
At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.
Re: Newer generations and the internet.
Well yeah, I don't have a problem with that. Did it myself actually.
Re: Newer generations and the internet.
So, who was the 17 year old you banged?
Re: Newer generations and the internet.
Yeah, heaven forbid they actually develop a healthy attitude towards it. That would be horrible!!
No, let's treat it as a sin and watch our kids commit suicide later. Much better!
Last edited by HoreTore; 09-22-2013 at 01:13.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks