Not sure how to unpack that dense brick of wrongness.
First of all, if you think Americans vote in their economic self-interest, then you haven't done any reading on the subject. I mean, you haven't even glanced at Wikipedia. You haven't bothered to learn anything on the topic.
The "base" of the Republican party is old and white, and takes more Federal dollars than any other group of non-veterans. And more importantly, they don't see it as a handout. I tried to explain to a hardcore Republican friend that his mortgage deduction and EIT credits were both middle-class payoffs. His head nearly exploded. The notion that the forgiveness of a tax debt was a payment, while obvious to anyone who has ever worked with an accountant, was utterly foreign to him. He refused the notion point-blank.
(This is pretty typical. If I'm receiving a payment or benefit, it's my hard-earned right and it's fair and it's just and equitable. If you are receiving a payment or benefit, you are a parasite and a leech and I'm not gonna pay for your damn lifestyle.)
And then there's this:
So, yeah. And then there's the fact that you consider me, a moderately successful dude who has actually started businesses and done okay in the private sector—what was your word?—an "outlier," or an "anomaly," or whatever the word you used.
Gah. Slowly, so the whole room can follow the idea: Americans. Do not. Vote. In their economic self-interest. (Or, to be more precise, the link between economic self-interest and voting patterns is "extremely weak," as the researchers say.)
Other point: You do not get to define who is in what party. People self-identify, and if they say they are Republicans, they are. If they say they are Democrats, they are. The moment you position yourself as superior to other people, judging who deserves to really be in one party or another ("Oh not him! He's a RINO!"), you self-identify as an arrogant ass.
-edit-
Another dense package of wrongness.
I view governments, corporations, cooperatives, LLCs, partnerships, unions, armies, and navies as ways to organize human beings and resources. None is inherently superior to another; all have their appropriate application. All can be parasitic, all can be beneficial. Depends on the cirumstances, context, and (most importantly) the truth revealed by real-world application. This is called empiricism. It also used to be a core element of conservatism, before that word got corrupted beyond all meaning.
Bookmarks