My impression is that the Roma aren't really nomadic by culture, just that they were a migratory people who, upon reaching Europe after some centuries of migration, developed an
itinerant culture.
The question is, why have they preserved and perpetuated this sort of culture for the past millenium of living among densely-clustered peoples?
Comparison to the Jews is incomplete, as Jewish peripateticism was usually reluctant or unwilling, in that Jews wanted to settle down and for various political or economic reasons after some years or even generations had to abandon their current homes. For instance, the movements of one side of my mother's family line (though I'd prefer to check the dating before marking it) can be traced thus (denoting areas of contemporary delineation): England - Germany - Italy - Poland - Romania - Belarus - Russia - Georgia. For each major movement AFAIK, these Jews moved on due to growing local hostility, never because they were actually made their living by travelling from place to place for the purpose of engaging in commerce with fresh populations. Note the perennial Jewish love of
agriculture and
settled-community life - do the Roma have any such yearning?
Also, Jews tended to integrate quite rapidly when given the opportunity (e.g. laxening of legal distinctions). Are any such applicable to Roma in Europe today (e.g. 'special' tax status)?
Bookmarks