Pratia III

[Chief Pappy]

I would also add that we are not a threat by number 3.

Judging by the host's emphasis on discussion, I would also conclude that our answers need to be fairly descriptive, or at least elegantly written. No 5 word sentences posing as an answer.

[edse]

Judging by the host's emphasis on discussion, I would also conclude that our answers need to be fairly descriptive, or at least elegantly written. No 5 word sentences posing as an answer.

Yes, that was just a short list to show the chosen alternatives. Darth Feather have to add some more arguments when he delivers the answers.

[Chief Pappy]

Yes, that was just a short list to show the chosen alternatives. Darth Feather have to add some more arguments when he delivers the answers.

This wasn't particularly directed at you, my friend I just noticed the trend and thought it should be addressed.

Onward to victory!

[autolycus]

elect:edse

1. We should kill one to save five, unless the five are cripples and thus drags on society.
2. Steal the medicine, life is too precious to set a value on.
3. See question 2, life is precious.

[dcmort93]

I'm going to go with elect: edse, he seems to have a solid head on his shoulders.

As for my responses to the moral questions;

1) Ideally we would find a way that all 6 would be able to live, however since this seems to be out of reach I would say kill 1 to save 5. If I were the one I would think of no better way to go out than by saving others

2) I would steal the meds in a heartbeat, unless the person I was stealing the meds for did not want the meds.

3) In this post-apocalyptic world we must find a way to work together for the common good.