But that still ignores other potential factors such as which part of her body the perverted test subject looks at first.
Zain could at least mention that in the limitations part of his study report (and don't forget to quote me properly! j/k).
Yeah, regarding motor functions, but does the left side calculate the right eye input and the right side the left eye input and does it matter whether you are left-handed or right-handed when the input is combined? And what implications does this have regarding the turning of this woman on a 2D screen where it doesn't really matter whether you have any eye preference? What you see isn't even a turning woman, it's just a warping of colours through switching of images with silhouettes. Only when your brain applies further logic and experience to it will it turn into a turning woman. That's why it also matters where you look first because different body parts and different stages of the movement may trigger different experiences being called up or different connections being made. And that is also why she can switch and turn the other way.
His findings may still be interesting, but even in small research, it helps to be aware of and point out the limitations and uncertainties of the study.
Bookmarks