So... You are doing it wrong then.
No wonder Sweden trampled you in each and every war.
Only positive with the 7.62 is the penetration in, say, concrete.
If you talk about effect on the human body, 5,56 wins. It also has less recoil and weights less (VERY important if you are an actual soldier).
There is a reason why all modern armies switched to 5.56 from 7.62
As Seamus explained above, the 7.62 was introduced all across Nato back in the day, and the last batch of AG3's are from the very early 70's. The battle rifle has a longer range than the assault rifle, while the assault rifle is far less bulky to drag through doors and alleys and such.
Weight and recoil concerns are for girly swedes, not something proper vikings care about.
Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban
So this is a Swede in action?
Days since the Apocalypse began
"We are living in space-age times but there's too many of us thinking with stone-age minds" | How to spot a Humanist
"Men of Quality do not fear Equality." | "Belief doesn't change facts. Facts, if you are reasonable, should change your beliefs."
Showing that recoil is a bad thingy isn't REALLY an argument against me here, is it?
The argument from me is more: The viking with less recoil will have a better chance at playing warfare.
See, with 5.56 you can have a assault rifle in one hand, and a two handed ax in the other!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Bookmarks