Results 1 to 30 of 240

Thread: responding to common objections to bible part 7

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Default responding to common objections to bible part 7

    a series responding to the most common objections to Christianity.


    How could a loving god send people to Hell?
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...people-to-Hell


    What about those who die without ever hearing about Jesus?
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...sus&highlight=


    does the bible allow slavery?-why is there death and suffering if god is all loving?/the reason for the gospel-does the bible command rape? was rape allowed?-why does god not show himself today?-has the bible been translated accurately?.
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...tions-to-bible


    Did Jesus claim to be divine?does the bible teach he was god?did man or the councils create Jesus's divinity after he died?-conquest of Canaan, did god order genocide? did god order the killings of entire towns? did god order the killings of woman and children?did god order the death of innocent life?. What was the reason for judgment on the Canaanites?- Did god harden Pharaoh heart? only to punish him for it?.
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...o-bible-part-4


    Sins of the fathers punish the children? are children or later generations punished for the sins of the fathers?-OT death penalty laws-What about the crusades,witch trials,inquisitions and other “crimes” of Christians throughout history-God sent plagues,even ones that killed babies such as the ten plagues of Egypt.How could a loving god do that.
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...t-5&highlight=


    Did god create evil? Isiah 45.7-was the bible influenced by other local religions? -Was Jesus a real human that lived in time-space?.-woman in bible
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...e-part-6-final


    part 7

    what is the meaning of eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth found in exodus 21? isen't this opposite of love your enemy as jesus said?.


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    eye for eye tooth for tooth found in exodus 21 23-25, than read v 26-27 it never taken as literal retaliation, but compensation for loss and penalty cannot exceed punishment.

    the bible has always taught to love your enemies.


    Do not say, “I’ll do to them as they have done to me;
    I’ll pay them back for what they did.” Proverbs 24.29


    “If you come across your enemy’s ox or donkey wandering off, be sure to return it. 5 If you see the donkey of someone who hates you fallen down under its load, do not leave it there; be sure you help them with it.
    exodus 23.4





    Why the bible's god over any other? is believing in god like believing in Santa or a flying spaghetti monster?


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    There can only be one truth, multiple gods cannot be true, assuming there is a god, only one can be true.


    why Christianity over any other god?
    There is only one creation account that has the support/backing of thousands of PHD scientist around the world, genesis. There is only one book world known for prophecy, the bible. The god of the bible has spoken to man and communicated through written word. The bible is a record of historical events, consistency supported by archeology. The bible has changed billions of lives, what other deity has done so?. Eye witness accounts of even enemies, record Jesus as a miracle worker. Also as the bible says somehow who raised from the dead, all other religious leader to have ever lived, can be found in graves were they died, jesus cannot.


    Bible is what god did for us, not what we can do for god [all other religions work based].
    All other belief systems say do enough good works to get to haven,give enough money,pray enough help enough old ladies across the street,don’t do this,don’t do that etc etc to get to haven. Christianity teaches no matter what you do you get to haven, you will never be as good as god[ perfect] you cant enter a perfect gods holiness and haven unless you have no sin. So here is what god did for you because he loves you,as a free gift of grace to openly revive haven. It is about what god did for us, not what we can do for god.



    the creation of the universe must be# non material because if it was material it would be subject to decay like all material, so the creator must be nonmaterial, spiritual and eternal psalm 90.2 these are biblical ideas of god.


    genesis is only true account of creation
    Genesis 1:1

    1:1 created. No other cosmogony, whether in ancient paganism or modern naturalism, even mentions the absolute origin of the universe. All begin with the space/time/matter universe, already existing in a primeval state of chaos, then attempt to speculate how it might have “evolved” into its present form. Modern evolutionism begins with elementary particles of matter evolving out of nothing in a “big bang” and then developing through natural forces into complex systems. Pagan pantheism also begins with elementary matter in various forms evolving into complex systems by the forces of nature personified as different gods and goddesses. But, very significantly, the concept of the special creation of the universe of space and time itself is found nowhere in all religion or philosophy, ancient or modern, except here in Genesis 1:1.

    Appropriately, therefore, this verse records the creation of space (“the heaven”), of time (“in the beginning”), and of matter (“the earth”), the Tri-universe, the space/time/matter continuum which constitutes our physical cosmos. The Creator of this tri-universe is the triune God, Elohim, the uni-plural Old Testament name for the divine “Godhead,” a name which is plural in form (with its Hebrew “im” ending) but commonly singular in meaning.
    The existence of a transcendent Creator and the necessity of a primeval special creation of the universe is confirmed by the most basic principles of nature discovered by scientists:
    (1) The law of causality, that no effect can be greater than its cause, is basic in all scientific investigation and human experience. A universe comprising an array of intelligible and complex effects, including living systems and conscious personalities, is itself proof of an intelligent, complex, living, conscious Person as its Cause;
    (2) The laws of thermodynamics are the most universal and best-proved generalizations of science, applicable to every process and system of any kind, the First Law stating that no matter/energy is now being created or destroyed, and the Second Law stating that all existing matter/energy is proceeding irreversibly toward ultimate equilibrium and cessation of all processes. Since this eventual death of the universe has not yet occurred and since it will occur in time, if these processes continue, the Second Law proves that time (and, therefore, the space/matter/time universe) had a beginning. The universe must have been created, but the First Law precludes the possibility of its self-creation. The only resolution of the dilemma posed by the First and Second Laws is that “in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” The so-called big bang theory of the origin of the cosmos, postulating a primeval explosion of the space/mass/time continuum at the start, beginning with a state of nothingness and then rapidly expanding into the present complex universe, contradicts both these basic laws

    Henry M. Morris is Director of the Institute for Creation Research, as well as the Academic Vice-President of Christian Heritage College. He received his Ph.D. in hydraulics, with minors in geology and mathematics. He has spent thirty years in education and research, including thirteen years as Professor of Hydraulic Engineering and Chairman of the Department of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He is also President of the Creation Research Society.


    Genesis is only creation account to explain the fossil record [Noah flood].
    http://www.answersingenesis.org/stor.../?sku=30-9-219
    http://www.answersingenesis.org/get-...flood-evidence
    http://www.amazon.com/Earths-Catastr.../dp/0932766943


    bible is only religion that can explain death and suffering
    number 4
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...tions-to-bible


    I could never myself believe in God, if it were not for the cross. #The only God I believe in is the One Nietzsche ridiculed as “God on the cross.” #In the real world of pain, how could one worship a God who was immune to it? #I have entered many Buddhist temples in different Asian countries and stood respectfully before the statue of the Buddha, his legs crossed, arms folded, eyes closed, the ghost of a smile playing round his mouth, a remote look on his face, detached from the agonies of the world. #But each time after a while I have had to turn away. #And in imagination I have turned instead to that lonely, twisted, tortured figure on the cross, nails through hands and feet, back lacerated, limbs wrenched, brow bleeding from thorn-pricks, mouth dry and intolerably thirsty, plunged in Godforsaken darkness. #That is the God for me! #He laid aside his immunity to pain. #He entered our world of flesh and blood, tears and death. #He suffered for us. #Our sufferings become more manageable in the light of his. #There is still a question mark against human suffering, but over it we boldly stamp another mark, the cross that symbolizes divine suffering. #”The cross of Christ . . . is God’s only self-justification in such a world” as ours. . . . “The other gods were strong; but thou wast weak; they rode, but thou didst stumble to a throne; But to our wounds only God’s wounds can speak, And not a god has wounds, but thou alone.”
    John Stott,#The Cross of Christ p 235-236



    The bible/jesus are different in theology and many other aspects than any and all other beliefs.



    bible is true history, confirmed by archaeology over and over.Confirming people,places and event throughout its history


    I claim to be an historian. My approach to Classics is historical. And I tell you that the evidence for the life, the death, and the resurrection of Christ is better authenticated than most of the facts of ancient history . . .
    E. M. Blaiklock#Professor of Classics#Auckland University

    debates on subject of historical Jesus resurrection.
    http://www.reasonablefaith.org/media/debates


    "I know of no finding in archeology that’s properly confirmed which is in opposition to the Scriptures. The Bible is the most accurate history textbook the world has ever seen."
    Dr Clifford Wilson, formerly director of the Australian Institute of Archaeology, being interviewed by radio by the Institute for Creation Research (ICR radio transcript No. 0279–1004Dr. Clifford Wilson His Ph.D. is from the University of South Carolina, and included ‘A’s for field work in archaeology undertaken In association with Hebrew Union College in Jerusalem.



    There exists no document from the ancient world, witnessed by so excellent a set of textual and historical testimonies . . . Skepticism regarding the historical credentials of Christianity is based upon an irrational bias.
    Clark PinnockMcmaster University


    "Through the wealth of data uncovered by historical and archaeological research, we are able to measure the Bible's historical accuracy. In every case where its claims can thus be tested, the Bible proves to be accurate and reliable."
    - Dr. Jack Cottrell, The Authority of the Bible (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1979), pp. 48-49.


    "In every instance where the findings of archaeology pertain to the Biblical record, the archaeological evidence confirms, sometimes in detailed fashion, the historical accuracy of Scripture. In those instances where the archaeological findings seem to be at variance with the Bible, the discrepancy lies with the archaeological evidence, i.e., improper interpretation, lack of evidence, etc. -- not with the Bible."
    - Dr. Bryant C. Wood, archaeologist, Associates for Biblical Research


    "It may be stated categorically that no archaeological discovery has ever controverted a Biblical reference. Scores of archaeological findings have been made which confirm in clear outline or exact detail historical statements in the Bible. And, by the same token, proper evaluation of Biblical description has often led to amazing discoveries."
    - Dr. Nelson Glueck, Rivers in the Desert, (New York: Farrar, Strous and Cudahy, 1959), 136.



    "Archaeology has confirmed countless passages which have been rejected by critics as unhistorical or contradictory to known facts......Yet archaeological discoveries have shown that these critical charges.....are wrong and that the Bible is trustworthy in the very statements which have been set aside as untrustworthy.....We do not know of any cases where the Bible has been proved wrong." -
    Dr. Joseph P. Free, Archaeology and Bible History. Scripture Press, Wheaton, IL, 1969, pg. 1


    "The reader may rest assured that nothing has been found [by archaeologists] to disturb a reasonable faith, and nothing has been discovered which can disprove a single theological doctrine. We no longer trouble ourselves with attempts to 'harmonize' religion and science, or to 'prove' the Bible. The Bible can stand for itself." -
    Dr. William F. Albright, eminent archeologist who confirmed the authenticity of the Dead Sea Scrolls following their discovery


    "There can be no doubt that archaeology has confirmed the substantial historicity of Old Testament tradition." -
    Dr. William F. Albright, Archaeology and the Religions of Israel. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1956, p. 176.


    "On the whole, however, archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the Scriptural record. More than one archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine....Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics. It has shown, in a number of instances, that these views rest on false assumptions and unreal, artificial schemes of historical development. This is a real contribution and not to be minimized." -
    Millar Burrows, Professor of Archaeology at Yale University, What Mean These Stones?, Meridian Books, New York, NY, 1956, p. 1


    "The excessive skepticism of many liberal theologians stems not from a careful evaluation of the available data, but from an enormous predisposition against the supernatural." -
    Professor Millar Burrows (Professor of Archaeology at Yale University), What Mean These Stones?, Meridian Books, New York, NY, 1956, p. 176.


    "It is therefore legitimate to say that, in respect of that part of the Old Testament against which the disintegrating criticism of the last half of the nineteenth century was chiefly directed, the evidence of archaeology has been to reestablish its authority and likewise to augment its value by rendering it more intelligible through a fuller knowledge of its background and setting. Archaeology has not yet said its last word, but the results already achieved confirm what faith would suggest – that the Bible can do nothing but gain from an increase in knowledge." -
    Sir Frederic Kenyon, a former director of the British Museum, The Bible and Archaeology (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1940), page 279.


    "I set out to look for truth on the borderland where Greece and Asia meet, and found it there. You may press the words of Luke in a degree beyond any other historian's and they stand the keenest scrutiny and the hardest treatment." -
    Sir William Ramsey (eminent archaeologists who changed his mind regarding Luke after extensive study in the field), (1915), The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1975 reprint), page 89.

    Luke is a historian of the first rank; not merely are his statements of facts trustworthy; he is possessed of the true historic sense...In short this author should be placed along with the very greatest of historians." -
    Sir William Ramsey (archaeologist), The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament, 1915, pages 81, 222


    The death/burial/Resurrection of Jesus was event in history.


    Luke Johnson, a New Testament scholar at Emory University,
    “Even the most critical historian can confidently assert that a Jew named Jesus worked as a teacher and wonder-worker in Palestine during the reign of Tiberius, was executed by crucifixion under the prefect Pontius Pilate and continued to have followers after his death”
    Luke Timothy Johnson,#The Real Jesus#(San Francisco: Harper San Francisco, 1996), p. 123.


    #"One of the most certain facts of history is that Jesus was crucified on orders of the Roman prefect of Judea, Pontius Pilate.”#
    atheist scholar #Bart Ehrman

    #Atheist New Testament scholar Gerd Lüdemann declares that “Jesus’ death as a consequence of crucifixion is indisputable.”#


    John Dominic Crossan, of the notoriously liberal Jesus Seminar, says that there is not the “slightest doubt about the fact of Jesus’ crucifixion under Pontius Pilate.” According to Crossan, “That he was crucified is as sure as anything historical can ever be.”#


    "I claim to be an historian. My approach to Classics is historical. And I tell you that the evidence for the life, the death, and the resurrection of Christ is better authenticated than most of the facts of ancient history . . ."
    E. M. Blaiklock#Professor of Classics# Auckland University



    and that shortly after within a few years, it was common knowledge to believed he was raised from the dead


    Paul’s statement of the gospel in#1 Cor. 15#cites an ancient tradition dating back to only a few years after the event. Mark’s account of the empty tomb reflects the Aramaic, pointing to a very early source. Dr William Lane Craig gives much evidence for the reliability of the burial and empty tomb accounts
    Craig, W.,#Apologetics: An Introduction, Moody, Chicago, USA, Ch. 5.2, 1984, and lists at least 30 prominent scholars who agree

    debates
    http://www.reasonablefaith.org/media...ollege-indiana
    http://www.reasonablefaith.org/media...ate-university
    http://www.reasonablefaith.org/media...the-holy-cross
    http://www.reasonablefaith.org/media...ate-university
    http://www.reasonablefaith.org/is-th...e-craig-ehrman



    Jesus was thought of even by enemies to be a healer and miracle worker.


    Prophecy only the bible out of any religious book, is known for its prophesy’s even by those of other religions admit to it. Multiple were fulfilled in the life of Jesus.

    21#“Present your case,” says the#Lord.
    ####“Set forth your arguments,” says Jacob’s King.
    22#“Tell us, you idols,
    what is going to happen.
    Tell us what the former things#were,
    so that we may consider them
    and know their final outcome.
    Or declare to us the things to come,
    23tell us what the future holds,
    so we may know#that you are gods.
    Do something, whether good or bad,
    ####so that we will be dismayed#and filled with fear.
    Isisah 41 21-23



    World Religions: What Makes Jesus Unique? Dr Ron carlson-bible written over thousands of years by kings,peasants men of all walks of life, yet describe one constant god throughout.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWzpk7X4veM
    http://www.christianministriesintl.o...pologetics.php



    Why your god over another?
    You see there is only one true God (Isaiah 44:6). He makes himself known to us through His Word, the Bible. However a lot of people have created their own gods which exist only in their imaginations—gods that allow them to live how they want, and they still get to a heaven in the end; gods who will look favourable upon them and their families and not punish their sin; gods who are not personal to them, but distant, and who don’t really bother much with them or affect their daily lives. However these ‘god’s are not real and have no power.
    Rather the Bible presents the one true God who, in His omnipotence, formed the universe by His command (Hebrews 11:3). He has no equal (Isaiah 40:21–31), and cannot be deceived or mocked as He knows all your ways (Galatians 6:7). He who wants to interact with the mind that he has given you in a fully intelligent way (Isaiah 1:18), and knowing that we could not save ourselves from our sin, sent His Son, Jesus Christ, to pay the price for our sins (John 3:16). I hope that you, “Stop trusting man, who has but a breath in his nostrils. Of what account is he?” (Isaiah 2:22), “take refuge in the#Lord” (Psalm 118:8) and come to true repentance and knowledge of saving faith through Jesus Christ.
    Every blessing,
    Phil


    Morality
    since Christianity started,morality has been brought to a higher level around the world. Care for poor,elderly,other races,classes forgiveness,putting others before self etc. Just compare the bible to Koran as far as morality goes.
    http://www.twcenter.net/forums/showt...nd-christanity


    worldview/presuppositions.
    Only a biblical worldview is internally constant and can make sense of the world around us and our presuppositions that everyone [even atheist] assume to be true.

    The ultimate proof of creation 3 part
    http://www.answersingenesis.org/medi...ultimate-proof
    http://www.answersingenesis.org/stor...creation-book/
    https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...ity&highlight=


    change in my life and billions of others
    Jesus has the ability to change a life comepletley around, not just religion going to church etc but a change of heart, not even a good felling,but a change of heart.

    I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone#and give you a heart of flesh.
    Ezekiel 36:26


    The bible is the best sold book ever, it is not even close,. Its the best most influential book ever written.
    http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/...of-non-fiction


    flying spaghetti monster comparison.
    First I will ask what makes the evolutionary fairy tale better than a flying spaghetti monster?. At least he has not been disproved scientifically yet, as your religions origins of life has been for about 200 years know. I dont think it would have to break quit as many scientific laws to be true. but I do question this spaghetti monster. Why did he not communicate until know if he is creator? 2,000 ad. I ask this of Muslims, why did god not give accurate info until Muhammad in 600 ad. But your is worse its 2000 ad for the spaghetti to speak. Also how can a material creator create the world? if it is material it will decay that is a scientific law. It will decay away, so it cant be eternal, but it has to be eternal to create or it was created itself. Therefore a material thing cannot be the creator. It has to be non-material and eternal.



    Santa vs god
    -evolutionist/atheist have no problem with believing in unobserved, for example they believe in unobserved matter coming alive life from non life that is unobserved and scientifically disproved.
    -car when you see a car you conclude a designed even if you have never seen the unobserved designer. Biological systems are far more complex than vehicles.
    -Santa can be shown to be false, demonstrably so.
    -Because one unobserved thing is false [Santa] does not make another unobserved thing false.
    -evolution use to say we had multiple [120] vestibular structures,we know have info that they are not, that does not make evolution false.
    -assuming their was no evidence for god,that does not disprove his existence,especially if their I reason for this.
    -what positive evidence is their to prove /observed atheism?





    Does god hate eunuchs?


    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    For this is what the#Lord#says:
    “To the eunuchs#who keep my Sabbaths,
    who choose what pleases me
    and hold fast to my covenant—
    5#to them I will give within my temple and its walls
    a memorial and a name
    better than sons and daughters;
    I will give them an everlasting name
    that will endure forever.
    6 And foreigners#who bind themselves to the#Lord
    to minister to him,
    to love the name of theLord,
    and to be his servants,
    all who keep the Sabbath#without desecrating it
    and who hold fast to my covenant—
    Isiah 56 4-5




    Moabites cant enter assembly of god?

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    I take this to mean any person of the religion [not people group] can enter, those that practice child sacrifice and other things that are a abomination to god [conquest of Canaan thread].


    Ruth was moabite book of ruth.

    God loves the foreign resident and Israel is commanded to do the same
    Deuteronomy 10.18-19





    Korah rebellion from numbers 16 did god kill children unjustly? [no children were killed] Off topic but this is were JRR Tolkien got the idea for the end of return of the king when the land swallowed up the evil [orcs etc] at the black gate.

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

    thank you for contacting Answers in Genesis.The word Sheol appears 65 times in the O.T. 31 times it means "the grave"; 31 times it means the "abode of the dead, both wicked and righteous) and 3 times it means simply a "dug out pit". There are also four other Hebrew words besides Sheol that are translated as "the pit" and none of those mean "hell". So there are two ways to look at these verses in Numbers 16.

    The first is that they are refering to physical death only. This makes sense in light of the even split between Sheol referring to the grave as much as hell in the O.T. It also makes sense in light of the phrase at the end of verse 33 (they perished from the assembly). and from Moses' own statement in verses 28-29
    28-29 "And Moses said: "By this you shall know that the LORD has sent me to do all these works, for I have not done them of my own will. "If these men die naturally like all men, or if they are visited by the common fate of all men, then the LORD has not sent me". Both of these statements refer to physical death (muwth and abad in the Hebrew meaning perish, die, be exterminated or executed). Plus, it is said in Scripture that the wicked dead will not have a body until the Great White Throne judgment in Rev. 20:5-14. These families would be exceptions to this statement if they were taken alive into Sheol/Hades the place of judgment. This is by far the stronger view, textually, linguistically and in accordance with other teachings of Scripture.

    The second position would be that these families were taken to Sheol/Hades alive. If this were the case, it would have to be an exception to the rule stated in Rev. 20. If this did occur, then your question about children needs to be addressed to some extent, but the answer is plain from Scripture and from Hebrew word study of Scripture. God is holy and just and will always do right (Gen. 18:25, Deut. 32:4,Ps. 99:5-9, Isa. 6:3). Plus as I will make the point below (in the last paragraph) it appears that the children didn't die at all (more on that later).
    Therefore whether we understand or not is moot, we can rest assured that God would not eternally destroy the righteous or the innocent with the wicked. We must also study the term used in Num. 16:27 for little children. The Hebrew word is "taph" and does not refer to infants, and doesn't seem to mean toddlers either. Most of the time it means daughters as opposed to sons, or boys younger than 13 but older than just walking age. Young male children (and toddlers in ggeneral) are often mentioned with the Hebrew word "yeled". It seems from usage then that this passage is probably referring to daughters and boys between 6 and 12. They probably had some knowledge of what was going on and so could have easily been "guilty" or at least non-innocent. Finally, even if this view is accepted, and they went alive into Sheol, it is quite possible that any "innocent" children could have gone to the righteous Sheol, while Korah and the other rebellious men and women went to the place of punishment Sheol/Hades (see Psalm 16 and Isa 38 verses and note below). Also keep in mind the following passage in Isaiah. Not all the times that a righteous person dies is it a judgment, more often it is as a mercy, so he doesn't become more wicked, or stays around to be vexed by it.
    Isa. 57:1 The righteous perishes, And no man takes it to heart; Merciful men are taken away, While no one considers That the righteous is taken away from evil.


    Num. 16:33 So they and all those with them went down alive into the pit [Sheol]; the earth closed over them, and they perished from among the assembly.

    Example of Sheol as also being for the righteous dead in the O.T.
    Ps 16:10 For You will not leave my soul in Sheol, Nor will You allow Your Holy One to see corruption.
    Isa. 38:9-10 This is the writing of Hezekiah king of Judah, when he had been sick and had recovered from his sickness: I said, "In the prime of my life I shall go to the gates of Sheol; I am deprived of the remainder of my years."

    All the passages below are translated "the grave", but the Hebrew word is Sheol, the same as in Num. 16

    Gen. 37:35 And all his sons and all his daughters arose to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted, and he said, "For I shall go down into the grave to my son in mourning." Thus his father wept for him.
    1 Sam. 2:6 "The LORD kills and makes alive; He brings down to the grave and brings up.
    1 Kings 2:9 "Now therefore, do not hold him guiltless, for you are a wise man and know what you ought to do to him; but bring his gray hair down to the grave with blood."
    Job 21:13 They spend their days in wealth, And in a moment go down to the grave.
    Ps 6:5 For in death there is no remembrance of You; In the grave who will give You thanks?
    Ps 30:3 O LORD, You brought my soul up from the grave; You have kept me alive, that I should not go down to the pit {Hebrew is bowr-meaning cistern}.
    Ps 49:14 Like sheep they are laid in the grave; Death shall feed on them; The upright shall have dominion over them in the morning; And their beauty shall be consumed in the grave, far from their dwelling.
    Ps 49:15 But God will redeem my soul from the power of the grave, For He shall receive me. Selah
    Ps 88:3 For my soul is full of troubles, And my life draws near to the grave.
    Ecc. 9:10 Whatever your hand finds to do, do it with your might; for there is no work or device or knowledge or wisdom in the grave where you are going.
    Hos. 13:14 "I will ransom them from the power of the grave; I will redeem them from death. O Death, I will be your plagues! O Grave, I will be your destruction! Pity is hidden from My eyes."

    But before I close, I want to make one more very important point. The children did not die. If you read the text carefully, you will see that it mentions the men and the households. So it is "assumed" that the children died too. In point of fact, they didn't.
    Read Number 26:9-11 The sons of Eliab were Nemuel, Dathan, and Abiram. These are the Dathan and Abiram, representatives of the congregation, who contended against Moses and Aaron in the company of Korah, when they contended against the LORD; and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed them up together with Korah when that company died, when the fire devoured two hundred and fifty men; and they became a sign. Nevertheless the children of Korah did not die. It appears from Scripture that any children younger than 13 (and possibly even older) did not die. Only the men and their wives did. Apparently sometime between while Moses was talking in Num. 16:29-30 and the ground opened up, other family members had come and pulled the children away from the tents and men involved in the rebellion.




    For later discussion on thread involving exodus look under spoiler.



    archaeology and the bible

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    some of the hundreds of finds confirming the bible

    archeological finds that confirms the bible


    for dozens of examples from NT and OT see
    The New Evidence That Demands A Verdict Fully Updated To Answer The Questions Challenging Christians Today
    by#Josh McDowell
    http://www.amazon.com/Evidence-Deman.../dp/0785243631



    The Tel Dan Stele (900–850 BC)- house of david
    The Meesha Stele (846 BC]-mentions Omri, King of Israel, and David of the United Monarchy. It even refers to Yahweh, the unique name of the God of Israel
    The Nabonidus Cylinder (550 BC)
    mentioning his elder son, Belshazzar by name. Critics of the Bible had claimed for many years that the account in the book of Daniel was wrong; they said Belshazzar was never a king in Babylon and that Nabonidus was not his father.
    Caiaphas Ossuary
    twelve ossuaries, one of them being none other than that of Caiaphas, the high priest who presided at the trial of Jesus.#

    Pilate Dedication Stone
    read: “Tiberieum, (Pon)tius Pilatus, (Praef)ectus Iuda(eae).” Those scholars who questioned Pilate’s existence (and the gospel accounts generally) were silenced with this amazing discovery!

    Dr. Bryant Wood presented the evidence from eleven seasons of excavations at Khirbet el-Maqatir. No other site meets all the criteria necessary to be the Ai of Joshua 7-8
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post...oshuas-Ai.aspx

    Joshua ai
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/book...x?id=HYPERLINK "http://www.biblearchaeology.org/bookstore/product.aspx?id=93"93
    also bible and spade vol 24 no 1
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/publ...eandspade.aspx




    battle of Jericho
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/book...x?id=HYPERLINK "http://www.biblearchaeology.org/bookstore/product.aspx?id=89"89



    boghazkoy Hittite capital
    considered imaginary people invented by biblical authors, the find showed they were a real vast empire and the bible was correct.


    The city of Shechem found.-
    Confirming multiple bible passages about it.


    Many horned alters found
    bible speaks many times of these.


    The philistines and the temple of Rameses the third.
    Bible mentions these people many times.

    Dan isreals northern most city
    found to be Canaanite taken over by Israelite [judges 20.1]

    Megiddo city of war
    confirms 1 kings 4.12 9.15]


    Shiloh
    josh 18 1 samuel 1-4

    shishak's invasion record [including Judah]
    confirming biblical account [ 1 kings 14 2 Chronicles 12]

    beth shemesh confirms both philistine and Israelite artifacts.
    1 samuel 6 12-15


    pool of gibeon
    2 Samuel 2.13 Jeremiah 41.12


    Gibeah,king sauls capital
    1 sam 10.26 11.4 15.34]

    beersheba
    1 kings 4.25

    samaria
    capital of the northern kingdom of Israel
    1 kings 16.24


    Judges: Forgotten History
    dozens of confirmations from the book of judges


    ivory as decorations
    1 kings 10.18

    house of Yahweh ostraon
    oldest mention of solomons temple outside of the bible


    seals of Israels royal courts
    uzziah hoshea hezekiah solomon


    the moabite stone
    gen 19.37 2 kings 3

    The black obelisk of shalmaneser
    enemy of isreal depicts jehu king of isreal bowing down before him [2 kings 9-10]


    king uzziah's burial plaque
    2 chronicles 26


    the siloam tunnel inscription
    confirms 2 kings 20.20 2 chronicles 32.20


    the lachish reliefs Assyrian king sennacherib picture the fall of the judan fortress lachish in 701 bc.
    2 kings 18.13

    tomb of the Priestley hezir family
    1 chronicles 24.15 and Nehemiah 10.20


    silver amulets-from 600 b c found verses from numbers 6 24-26 inscribed.



    king solomons 10th century bc city
    what we have proof of is that there were kingdoms in the 10th century,”

    But what he found in Jordan was groundbreaking — thousands of tons of slag, a by-product of smelting ore, and different types of blowpipes. Using the process of radiocarbon dating, his team discovered there was industrial-scale metal production of copper precisely in 10th century BC.
    “It would have been like the Pittsburg of Palestine,” said Levy.
    http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/ind...ntentHYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"&HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"view=articleHYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"&HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"id=HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"42912HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89":claire-HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"harlin-writing-for-sdnewscomHYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"&HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"catid=HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"87HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89":regional-newsHYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"&HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"Itemid=HYPERLINK "http://sandiegonewsroom.com/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=42912:claire-harlin-writing-for-sdnewscom&catid=87:regional-news&Itemid=89"89



    King Solomon's Wall Found—Proof of Bible Tale?
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/HYPERLINK "http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100226-king-solomon-wall-jerusalem-bible/"2010HYPERLINK "http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100226-king-solomon-wall-jerusalem-bible/"/HYPERLINK "http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100226-king-solomon-wall-jerusalem-bible/"02HYPERLINK "http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100226-king-solomon-wall-jerusalem-bible/"/HYPERLINK "http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100226-king-solomon-wall-jerusalem-bible/"100226HYPERLINK "http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/02/100226-king-solomon-wall-jerusalem-bible/"-king-solomon-wall-jerusalem-bible/
    also
    Archaeologists Return to 'King Solomon's Mines' of Biblical Edom
    In short, convincing evidence now supported the suggestion that a massive copper production facility had been operating at KEN during the 10th and 9th centuries B.C., a time period that up until now had been assumed by many scholars, in particular the minimalists, to predate by at least two centuries the emergence of the fully-developed kingdoms of ancient Edom and Israel
    http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/april-HYPERLINK "http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/april-2011/article/archaeologists-return-to-king-solomon-s-mines-of-biblical-edom"2011HYPERLINK "http://popular-archaeology.com/issue/april-2011/article/archaeologists-return-to-king-solomon-s-mines-of-biblical-edom"/article/archaeologists-return-to-king-solomon-s-mines-of-biblical-edom


    Biblical Samson Tale May Be Depicted on Ancient Seal
    http://news.yahoo.com/biblical-samso...141644512.html




    a miniature Solomon Temple from 1000 BC means that the real Temple MUST HAVE EXISTED prior to the model. It does fits nicely with Ussher, who had Salomon starting his reign about 1015 BC, which would place the Temple up and running by 1004 BC:

    http://news.yahoo.com/earliest-evide...140333875.html


    A monumental synagogue building dating to the Late Roman period has been discovered in archaeological excavations at Huqoq in the Galilee, which includes a mosaic depicting Samson...
    http://www.antiquities.org.il/articl...id=25HYPERLINK "http://www.antiquities.org.il/article_Item_eng.asp?sec_id=25&subj_id=240&id=1946&module_id=#as"&HYPERLINK "http://www.antiquities.org.il/article_Item_eng.asp?sec_id=25&subj_id=240&id=1946&module_id=#as"subj_id=240HYPERLINK "http://www.antiquities.org.il/article_Item_eng.asp?sec_id=25&subj_id=240&id=1946&module_id=#as"&HYPERLINK "http://www.antiquities.org.il/article_Item_eng.asp?sec_id=25&subj_id=240&id=1946&module_id=#as"id=1946HYPERLINK "http://www.antiquities.org.il/article_Item_eng.asp?sec_id=25&subj_id=240&id=1946&module_id=#as"&HYPERLINK "http://www.antiquities.org.il/article_Item_eng.asp?sec_id=25&subj_id=240&id=1946&module_id=#as"module_id=#as


    Archaeologists uncover evidence of early cultivation and crop storage throughout the Fertile Crescent.
    http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...rtile-crescent


    Jewish city of Shiloh, the first home of the Tabernacle, the portable sanctuary that for 369 years was the epicenter of religious observance and sacrifices as the Jewish people traveled in the desert.
    “People come to Shiloh because it was the first capital of the Jewish nation, it was a spiritual center where the Tabernacle -- housing the ark, the menorah (candelabra), the table, and everything needed to serve God) -- was sitting. This is where#
    http://www.jpost.com/VideoArticles/2...aspx?id=281335


    "Hebrew speakers were controlling Jerusalem in the 10th century, which biblical chronology points to as the time of David and Solomon," ancient Near Eastern history and biblical studies expert Douglas Petrovich told FoxNews.com.
    "Whoever they were, they were writing in Hebrew like they owned the place," he said.

    :#http://www.foxnews.com/science/2013/...#ixzz2cIKZ8GR3
    Ophel inscription: oldest Hebrew writing corroborates Bible history
    http://creation.com/ophel


    King David-Era Palace Found in Israel, Archaeologists Say

    http://news.yahoo.com/king-david-era...141207932.html



    NT finds

    judge feels the prosecution failed to prove the “james” ossuary is fake.
    Nov 2010 the Jerusalem post christian edition p 17
    also
    http://creation.com/james-ossuary-stands




    The Knucklebone of John the Baptist?
    A knucklebone claimed to be of John the Baptist has been dated as first century AD by Oxford researchers...



    #Now some of the Jews thought that the destruction of Herod's army came from God, and that very justly, as a punishment of what he did against John, that was called the Baptist: for Herod slew him, who was a good man, and commanded the Jews to exercise virtue, both as to righteousness towards one another, and piety towards God, and so to come to baptism; for that the washing [with water] would be acceptable to him, if they made use of it, not in order to the putting away [or the remission] of some sins [only], but for the purification of the body; supposing still that the soul was thoroughly purified beforehand by righteousness. Now when [many] others came in crowds about him, for they were very greatly moved [or pleased] by hearing his words, Herod, who feared lest the great influence John had over the people might put it into his power and inclination to raise a rebellion, (for they seemed ready to do any thing he should advise,) thought it best, by putting him to death, to prevent any mischief he might cause, and not bring himself into difficulties, by sparing a man who might make him repent of it when it would be too late. Accordingly he was sent a prisoner, out of Herod's suspicious temper, to Macherus, the castle I before mentioned, and was there put to death. Now the Jews had an opinion that the destruction of this army was sent as a punishment upon Herod, and a mark of God's displeasure to him.
    The Antiquities of the Jews/Book XVIII

    Towns found
    -betlehem,nazareth,bethsaidia,cana,peters house in capernaum,gergesa,bethany,tiberias,caesarea philippi,megiddo,decapolis,ephesus,thessalonica,antioch,phillippi,
    pontius pilate inscription
    the pool of bethesda in jurselem
    synagogue in capernaum [mark 1,3 luke 4 john 6]

    jacobs well near sychar

    caiaphas's family tomb-

    rolling stone tombs in isreal area, same kind that fits jesus description in matt 27,28 mk 15 16 luke 24

    herodium-king herods palace


    the galilee boat

    pilates praetorium

    herods temple

    “place of trumpeting temple inscription from jesus day
    matt 27 mk 15 john 18


    damascas “street called straight”
    acts 9

    the areopagus at athens
    acts 17

    the gallio inscription
    acts 18.12


    the bema at corinth
    acts 18

    the erastus inscription
    romans 16.23


    “god fearers” inscription in turkey
    acts 17 acts 13

    the seven churches of revaluations
    revaluations 11




    Objections to the bible including exodus



    Objections to bible archeology

    archeology studies things from thousands of years ago, you cannot find all items through history. The bible has been confirmed from many areas but not in all areas, as it was long ago.

    As the famous archeology saying goes

    “Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence”


    dozens of times it has been claimed that the bible was wrong do to lack of proof, only for future years and discoveries to prove them wrong. The bible skeptics attack the few areas that have yet to fill in, and ignore the confirmations.




    video totally destroying the jesus family tomb
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/book...x?id=HYPERLINK "http://www.biblearchaeology.org/bookstore/product.aspx?id=100"100



    documentary hypothesis
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/HYPERLINK "http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post/2010/09/24/The-Documentary-Hypothesis.aspx"2010HYPERLINK



    new technology is making the exodus filled in were it was not before, not until 90's was evidence starting to come in and continues to rapidly, supporting the biblical account, for future reports follow here
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/.


    The exodus-
    Israelite in egypt from the time of jacob site tell el dab'a
    rameses the city the jews lived in/land of goshen eastern delta
    escavations started in 1960's
    non Egyptian Asian/ modern Israel Syria.
    Pottery shows from sountern cannan-were jacob was from
    burial and town site fit jospeh/Israelite being buried there.
    Burial site contained bones of all dead but the one major tomb of important political leader [ex 13.19]


    the exodus from ramses 1446 B.C
    site-tell el dab'a ancient capital from time of moses 18th dynasty
    austrian team,traced path of nile- palace complex built right on nile, as the bible describes.
    Royal precinct found/royal capital- pharoh also had another royal palace in memphis at same time.
    located adjacent to the pelusiac branch of nile
    abandon at about the time of the exodus/atheist austrian team said most likely a plague. [Biektak and Forstner-muller, agypten und levante 15 [2005] 93 95
    Amenophis/amenhotep the second pharoah of exodus


    exodus rout
    reed sea turned north not south- ballah lakeancient [refereed to as reed sea] formally much larger, still reeds in it today.
    Fort migdol- mentioned in bible
    rout traced is correct, names,geography given etc.



    "We have published a number of articles that demonstrate an Asiatic presence in Egypt during the time of the Sojourn-Exodus period, consistent with the Biblical depiction.We are presently working on additional research in this area, which we hope to publish in the future. Meanwhile, here are some articles of interest:
    #
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post...-in-Egypt.aspx
    #http://www.biblearchaeology.org/tag/joseph.aspx
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post...t-Rameses.aspx
    #http://www.biblearchaeology.org/post...rom-Egypt.aspx
    #
    I hope this is helpful material.Thanks for your support of the ABR ministry.
    #
    Blessings,
    ______________________________
    Henry B. Smith Jr.
    Director of Development
    Associates for Biblical Research


    Dr. Bryant Wood#presents evidence that refutes five criticisms of the Bible. Criticism #1: There is no evidence for the presence of the Israelites in Egypt. #2: There was no capital at Rameses for the Israelites to depart from. #3: There is no evidence for the route, date and nature of the Exodus. #4: Jericho was not occupied#when the Israelites entered Canaan.##5: The city of Ai recorded in Joshua 7-8 shows no evidence for destruction as the Bible records it.
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/book...ct.aspx?id=129



    Criticism #6: The Philistines mentioned in Genesis are a fictitious anachronism. #7:#King David is a#legendary character#in the same vein as King Arthur. #8: Jerusalem was not the capital of Israel during the time of David. #9: There is no evidence#for a kingdom in Edom at the time of David. #10: Most, if not all, of Israel's#history as recorded in the Bible should not be accepted.##
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/book...ct.aspx?id=128
    Last edited by total relism; 07-01-2014 at 16:35.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  2. #2
    Banned Kadagar_AV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In average 2000m above sea level.
    Posts
    4,176

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    YEY!!!!! I was waiting for part 7!!!

    Thank god you'r back, we have had to little crazy rambling lately.

  3. #3
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Genesis is only creation account to explain the fossil record [Noah flood].
    LOL
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  4. #4

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    LOL
    coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  5. #5
    Horse Archer Senior Member Sarmatian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Novi Sad, Serbia
    Posts
    4,315

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    With the possibility of a WW3 upon us, this is probably the worst possible time or the best possible time to discuss religion.

    Members thankful for this post (3):



  6. #6
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here.
    Sure.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  7. #7

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here. I hope you bring this link up and say you agree with it and its true and you have studied to find out. Otherwise your just showing your accepting of your religion without questioning it and total faith in there theology and inability to question and think for yourself....we shall see.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  8. #8
    Clan Clan InsaneApache's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grand Duchy of Yorkshire
    Posts
    8,636

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here.
    Priceless.
    There are times I wish they’d just ban everything- baccy and beer, burgers and bangers, and all the rest- once and for all. Instead, they creep forward one apparently tiny step at a time. It’s like being executed with a bacon slicer.

    “Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedy.”

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticise.

    "The purpose of a university education for Left / Liberals is to attain all the politically correct attitudes towards minorties, and the financial means to live as far away from them as possible."

    Member thankful for this post:



  9. #9
    Clan Takiyama Senior Member CBR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,408

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Oh yes, I will provide examples of creationist using such terms. Just not sure why I even have to...like asking me to provide examples of the sky being blue.

  10. #10
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Guys, look!! I found this website chock full with prophecies, and they almost always come true!!
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

    Member thankful for this post:



  11. #11

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Guys, look!! I found this website chock full with prophecies, and they almost always come true!!


    do they have hundreds of years in advance?
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  12. #12

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    Guys, look!! I found this website chock full with prophecies, and they almost always come true!!
    Did you know you can get them delivered daily to your phone, as well?
    - Tellos Athenaios
    CUF tool - XIDX - PACK tool - SD tool - EVT tool - EB Install Guide - How to track down loading CTD's - EB 1.1 Maps thread


    ὁ δ᾽ ἠλίθιος ὣσπερ πρόβατον βῆ βῆ λέγων βαδίζει” – Kratinos in Dionysalexandros.

  13. #13
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    I am a Catholic. The largest Christian denomination on the planet earth accepts the theory of evolution. Most other denominations that I know of do as well. Likewise, the big bang theory is accepted. Science explains the how, my faith explains the why.

    If anyone here has theological questions, your best bet is to sit through a Mass or service and listen to the homily. I recomend that you do this with a single question per week for the rest of your life at a church that provides you with peace. You should also speak to scholars from other religions for a deeper understanding.

    The answers from people who don't despise the Bible will be very different from the answers provided on a Total War forum.
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 03-16-2014 at 11:25.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

  14. #14
    Amphibious Trebuchet Salesman Member Whacker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    in ur city killin ur militias
    Posts
    2,934

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    So.... anyone else like basket weaving? I'm really thinking about getting into that.

    "Justice is the firm and continuous desire to render to everyone
    that which is his due."
    - Justinian I

    Member thankful for this post:

    Hax 


  15. #15

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by Brenus View Post
    you no longer defend isreal copying in 6th century bc it seems” Err, I never gave a date as it is, first, irrelevant, and, second, I have no indication of when the Jewish Script(s) decided to incorporate the Sumerian Myth in the Bible.

    There are civilizations around today that dont have technology of USA or europe, yet are older.” True, but irrelevant. If theses civilisations want to reach the level of Europe or USA, they will have to learn and developed the same skills. So, they will still have to learn the several technologies to make possible the development of a new technology.

    absence of evidence is not evidence against.” Nice try. Do try this in a Court of Justice. I have no evidence you kill your neighbour, doesn’t prove you didn’t kill him/her. In our case, even if the neighbour is still alive.

    well since you seem unaware of your own claim [not a surprise given you never read accounts] i shall enlighten you.

    The whole Gilgamesh-derivation theory is based on the discredited Documentary Hypothesis. This assumes that the Pentateuch was compiled by priests during the Babylonian Exile in the 6th century BC. But the internal evidence shows no sign of this, and every sign of being written for people who had just come out of Egypt. The Eurocentric inventors of the Documentary Hypothesis, such as Julius Wellhausen, thought that writing hadn’t been invented by Moses’ time. But many archaeological discoveries of ancient writing show that this is ludicrous..


    so if not than when did they copy from them? jews copied a story from enemies at a time they were separate because?


    civilizations
    missed whole point, when is what is important,age, you own statement proves what i said to be true. That technology does not equal perfect age.


    “absence of evidence is not evidence against
    that is why i said in archaeology.





    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    All early civilizations arose around a river. They were based on the annual flooding, but a larger-than-normal flooding would spell doom.

    It's no surprise that you'll find myths concerning a giant flood in each of these civilizations. It was the ultimate fear of these civilizations.



    Nonsense. Again, don't play with fallacies until you're older, son. Ad hominem is concerned with an argument. More specifically, it is when someone tries to disquise an attack upon a person as an argument against their case.

    Pannonian made a remark on your person which he did not try to disguise as an argument against your case. Thus, this is not an example of an ad hominem argument.

    Anyway, you wrote in your OP:



    I have attempted to debate this point, but you refused to comment on the contradictory statements of Matthew and Luke concerning the date of Jesus' birth. So, I'll try another:

    The exodus is a made up story. The Jewish people were never held in captivity in Egypt. The story is not found anywhere else than in the bible, and the Egyptians were very keen on recording their history. There is no mention of hardships for Egypt in the time the plagues supposedly took place, nor is there a reference to an army being lost. There is no archeological evidence of any Jewish presence in Egypt, and there's a wealth of evidence saying the Jews were in palestine the entire time. The places the jews supposedly stayed at during their 40 years in the desert did not exist until centuries later than when it supposedly took place. The bible, usually extremely anal about naming people, does not name the chief antagonist of the story, the Pharaoh.

    In conclusion, the story was made up at a later date to justify jewish dominance over palestine. It is a political, not a historical, story.

    coming from someone who has committed many logical fallacies [53] than claim i committed a strawman [64] warned me to wait till i was older to use logical fallacies. Only to than admit you were wrong and i did not commit it [80] claimed another logical fallacies goalpost [74,refuted 80, showed you dont read post b-4 commenting] than commited one more on 114 that i did not even feel needed responding to.



    ad hominem
    while i agree with what you said, if you read post 159 [this seems common you always miss what starts discussion and come to wrong conclusion]. he was using the personal attack [spelling grammar] as a response to what i had sed in argument against brenus i believe that he quoted.



    I have attempted to debate this point, but you refused to comment on the contradictory statements of Matthew and Luke concerning the date of Jesus' birth. So, I'll try another:


    This is a contradiction claim,not archaeological claim.


    The exodus is a made up story.The exodus is a made up story. The Jewish people were never held in captivity in Egypt. The story is not found anywhere else than in the bible, and the Egyptians were very keen on recording their history. There is no mention of hardships for Egypt in the time the plagues supposedly took place, nor is there a reference to an army being lost. There is no archeological evidence of any Jewish presence in Egypt, and there's a wealth of evidence saying the Jews were in palestine the entire time. The places the jews supposedly stayed at during their 40 years in the desert did not exist until centuries later than when it supposedly took place. The bible, usually extremely anal about naming people, does not name the chief antagonist of the story, the Pharaoh.In conclusion, the story was made up at a later date to justify jewish dominance over palestine. It is a political, not a historical, story.




    I agree 100% with you actually. That is because you follow the traditional timeline current held by most, if true i agree than that would make your whole point good and valid. If the traditional timeline [that is unknown by created and built on assumptions and has horrible problems etc] than the time of the exodus is wrong. I am busy now to get into details i will leave you some references to look over at moment. I believe once the current chronology is changed by 150 or maybe 350 years [it has been awhile] the evidence for the exodus goes from zero to amazing. More and more secular archaeologist and universities are teaching the reduced chronologies such as Cambridge and others.



    Egyptian dating

    Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 
    Egyptian dating

    the Egyptian dating is always being lowered to a earlier date.
    It cannot match up with other countries writing with its current extended date

    -the Egyptians did not record history they get it from temple walls
    -there are 5 kings list which contradict each other and all have gaps as well
    -manethos king list is not chronological, there are many at same time overlapping, it was several kings reining at the same time In different regions. He assumed the pharoes reigns were consecutive coming to a extended chronology. But some of these kings were ruling at the same time but different kingdoms. The upper,middle and lower kingdom, sometimes fathers and sons reigned together for long periods of time.
    -A few recent books have been written challenging current accepted date to shorten Egyptian dates.
    -Cambridge is now teaching reduced age and other scholars are as well
    -link below shows many problems with Egyptian chronology and why it needs to be shortened
    -many countries match up, but than differ with Egypt current extended age
    unmasking the pharoahs david down 2006



    Also there kings list is not very accurate it has problems with matching other country's writings, also the bibles kings list names kings places and dates through there whole list so which should we listen to?

    England's top archaeologist professor Colin renfew of Cambridge supports the reduced chronology of Egypt and in his book centuries of darkness said “That a chronological revolution is on its way”
    http://www.amazon.com/Centuries-Dark...y/dp/HYPERLINK
    josh mcdowell kings list ot reliability video free online video on reliability of bibles kings list
    http://www.josh.org/site/c.ddKDIMNtEqG/b.HYPERLINK "http://www.josh.org/site/c.ddKDIMNtEqG/b.4172663/k.624E/Can_I_Trust_the_Bible.htm"4172663HYPERLINK



    LOWERING THE DATESThe very earliest Egyptian date would be the one assigned to the beginning of its first dynasty. Menes was the first king. Cerem, in his Gods, Graves, and Scholars, tells us that the date assigned to that earliest Egyptian event, as estimated by several scholars, has gradually lowered with the passing of time: Champollian - 5867 B.C. / Lesueur -5770 B.C. / Bokh - 5702 B.C. / Unger - 5613 B.C. / Mariette - 5004 B.C. / Brugsch - 4455 B.C. / Lauth - 4157 B.C. / Chabas - 4000 B.C. / Lapsius - 3890 B.C. / Bunsen - 3623 B.C. / Breasted - 3400 B.C. / George Steindorff - 3200 B.C. / Eduard Meyer - 3180 B.C. / Wilkinson -2320 B.C. / Palmer - 2224 B.C.


    At the present time that earliest of Egyptian dates is considered to be c. 3100 B.C., with some considering 2900 B.C. still better.

    "In the course of a single century's research, the earliest date in Egyptian historythat of Egypt's unification under King Meneshas plummeted from 5876 to 2900 B.C. and not even the latter year has been established beyond doubt. Do we, in fact, have any firm dates at all?" Johannes Lehmann, The Hittites (1977), p. 204.

    Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis
    http://www.answersingenesis.org/arti...nology-genesis

    #The analyses suggest the rise to statehood occurred between 200 and 300 years faster than previously thought, beginning between 3800 B.C. and 3700 B.C., rather than the past estimate of 4000 B.C.#
    http://www.nbcnews.com/science/who-r...yet-8C11071362

    http://creation.com/timing-is-everything good article on Egyptian dating





    this would be good for exodus

    Dr. Bryant Wood presents evidence that refutes five criticisms of the Bible. Criticism #1: There is no evidence for the presence of the Israelites in Egypt. #2: There was no capital at Rameses for the Israelites to depart from. #3: There is no evidence for the route, date and nature of the Exodus. #4: Jericho was not occupied when the Israelites entered Canaan. #5: The city of Ai recorded in Joshua 7-8 shows no evidence for destruction as the Bible records it
    http://www.biblearchaeology.org/book...ct.aspx?id=129


    Unwrapping the Pharaohs
    http://www.amazon.com/Unwrapping-Pha.../dp/0890514682
    Last edited by total relism; 03-16-2014 at 14:09.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  16. #16
    has a Senior Member HoreTore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    12,014

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    coming from someone who has committed many logical fallacies [53] than claim i committed a strawman [64] warned me to wait till i was older to use logical fallacies. Only to than admit you were wrong and i did not commit it [80] claimed another logical fallacies goalpost [74,refuted 80, showed you dont read post b-4 commenting] than commited one more on 114 that i did not even feel needed responding to.

    ad hominem
    while i agree with what you said, if you read post 159 [this seems common you always miss what starts discussion and come to wrong conclusion]. he was using the personal attack [spelling grammar] as a response to what i had sed in argument against brenus i believe that he quoted.
    lol, this is just too funny. As I have said several times already, don't play around with fallacies until you're older. It would be preferable for you to get some knowledge of mathematics and/or logic before you do.

    You could say that Brenus' comment of your struggles with reality was an ad hominem attack. Pannonian's comment, however, was simply an expansion of Brenus' attack on you, while not dealing with any of Brenus arguments at all. It is thus a pure personal attack, and so fails the definition of an ad hominem. It was nothing more than an assertion of your complete lack of education.

    If I were you, I would also focus on actually reading the posts made by others, instead of trying to figure out whether or not someone else is reading them.

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    I agree 100% with you actually. That is because you follow the traditional timeline current held by most, if true i agree than that would make your whole point good and valid. If the traditional timeline [that is unknown by created and built on assumptions and has horrible problems etc] than the time of the exodus is wrong. I am busy now to get into details i will leave you some references to look over at moment. I believe once the current chronology is changed by 150 or maybe 350 years [it has been awhile] the evidence for the exodus goes from zero to amazing. More and more secular archaeologist and universities are teaching the reduced chronologies such as Cambridge and others.
    Moving the timeline by 150-350 years moves the exodus from the category of "impossible" to "impossible and absurd". Congratulations.

    The main facts are:
    1. There is no evidence whatsoever of any hebrew presence in Egypt
    2. There is no evidence of over half a million people milling about the Sinai for 40 years, nor is there any evidence of the major incidents mentioned, like the demise of Pharaos(who is "curiously" not named) army
    3. There is plenty of evidence of a continued Hebrew presence in Palestine.

    The exodus is a clear political document, made up to justify all the raping, pillaging and slaughtering committed by the israelites when they asserted their dominance in Palestine. In that regard, it is similar to other claims, like Rome's claim of a Trojan beginning.

    I would strongly suggest you get some education before you try to deal with tricky subjects like archeology, history and biology.
    Last edited by HoreTore; 03-16-2014 at 16:24.
    Still maintain that crying on the pitch should warrant a 3 match ban

  17. #17

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by ICantSpellDawg View Post
    I am a Catholic. The largest Christian denomination on the planet earth accepts the theory of evolution. Most other denominations that I know of do as well. Likewise, the big bang theory is accepted. Science explains the how, my faith explains the why.

    If anyone here has theological questions, your best bet is to sit through a Mass or service and listen to the homily. I recomend that you do this with a single question per week for the rest of your life at a church that provides you with peace. You should also speak to scholars from other religions for a deeper understanding.

    The answers from people who don't despise the Bible will be very different from the answers provided on a Total War forum.


    here is from a catholic creation site, would be good for you.

    The Traditional Catholic Doctrine of Creation
    http://www.kolbecenter.org/the-tradi...e-of-creation/

    Evolution and Revisionist Catholicism
    http://www.kolbecenter.org/evolution...t-catholicism/

    WHY FAITHFUL CATHOLICS SHOULD OPPOSE EVOLUTION
    http://www.rtforum.org/lt/lt28.html#II


    your denomination makes no claim and says either creation/evolution could be true.



    you said
    Science explains the how

    I agree fully, this is better for another thread though. It is science that caused me to become a creationist and reject evolution.


    You should also speak to scholars from other religions for a deeper understanding.
    I do,but what understanding do you believe they have? is it not a false understanding?


    The answers from people who don't despise the Bible will be very different from the answers provided on a Total War forum.
    I agree with that, but i go places people hate god [twc,here other places] on purpose.
    Last edited by total relism; 03-16-2014 at 14:25.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  18. #18
    Part-Time Polemic Senior Member ICantSpellDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    7,237

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    I don't make arguments about Genesis or Exodus. I take the Bible as an extremely important book in understanding the nature of man with the inspiration of God as the source, recorded with man's hand. Inconsistencies don't keep me up at night and do not pre-occupy me. Again, reason is extremely important in Catholic Theology and the Church that I know is open to knowledge and understanding.

    Biblical fundamentalism is alien to me. I have only ever met one person who believed that God or Satan planted dinosaur bones in order to trick us into old earth heresy. That person had a fist sized piece of their brain removed. I do not hold such arguments in high regard.

    I believe that God directs our lives in mysterious ways and that we are only privy to a tiny piece of truth. More, if you use your mind and the minds of others to reason.
    Last edited by ICantSpellDawg; 03-16-2014 at 17:24.
    "That rifle hanging on the wall of the working-class flat or labourer's cottage is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there."
    -Eric "George Orwell" Blair

    "If the policy of the government, upon vital questions affecting the whole people, is to be irrevocably fixed by decisions of the Supreme Court...the people will have ceased to be their own rulers, having to that extent practically resigned the government into the hands of that eminent tribunal."
    (Lincoln's First Inaugural Address, 1861).
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Members thankful for this post (2):



  19. #19
    Banned Kadagar_AV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In average 2000m above sea level.
    Posts
    4,176

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    The general idea is to not sprout things out of your behind and expect people buy it.


    apply to yourself, someone claims no evidence for noahs flood,no global flood, yet does not provide anything for claim. I say there is, that leads us off topic for a future great thread.
    You want me to supply evidence... That there are no evidence...? Are you on drugs!?!?!?

    Have you heard of Russel's Teapot? He answered your line of thinking way better than me.

    But long story short, YOU are the one making a claim something exists, thus YOU have to provide evidence for it. Would you believe it fair if I stated that Invisible Unicorns exist, and then expect you to PROVE me wrong? Of course not!

    The general idea is to not sprout things out of your behind and expect people buy it.
    you claim my past threads have been shot down. Please apply here, please show me on any thread [on the thread you claim] were it has been shot down as you baseless claim.

    you wont be able to support any of your claims without not responding and ignoring refutations. That is why any claim you make of my threads being shot down, i can just show counter post you ignored or did not read.

    The rest is just clear case of you wanting me to shut up, given your history on my threads i dont blame you one bit.
    You think your previous threads have been successful? Re-read them, everyone is absolutely laughing themselves to bits over your line of reasoning and argumentational skills. Just like now.

  20. #20

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by HoreTore View Post
    ....And how does not the same apply to biblical literalism...? How can someone believe the bible to be an inerrant history book, when we continually discover facts which disprove it, and extremely rarely discover something which supports it?

    The brilliant thing about science, however, is that we actually do change stuff. A biblical literalist does not change his position, ever. Give strong evidence to a scientist, and he will discard his old view. Give strong evidence to a biblical literalist, and he will conjure up some pseudoscience.

    HT i agree 100% how could someone believe something show false [evolution will be future thread] many times over?. I would not believe the bible if it were shown false over and over,the assumption being,it has been proven false over and over. no dout you can find claims luke census,no evidence in egypt, than run with it because you like the conclusion, but never question it as you do. Or you can watch debates,study and find at the end the bible was right all along, you could start with the references i gave you, we both know you wont because your not after truth.

    as for evolutionist, when i do my thread if you watch debates and references, you will see over and over evolutionist wrong, evidence against their position yet they still believe. They will change how evolution happened, but wont question materialistic/naturalistic assumptions and that evolution happened no matter what. All people are worldview driven, I will show studies and evolutionist who admit to just what your saying of them being fully false. But that would be to off topic here.


    Quote Originally Posted by Kadagar_AV View Post
    You want me to supply evidence... That there are no evidence...? Are you on drugs!?!?!?

    Have you heard of Russel's Teapot? He answered your line of thinking way better than me.

    But long story short, YOU are the one making a claim something exists, thus YOU have to provide evidence for it. Would you believe it fair if I stated that Invisible Unicorns exist, and then expect you to PROVE me wrong? Of course not!



    You think your previous threads have been successful? Re-read them, everyone is absolutely laughing themselves to bits over your line of reasoning and argumentational skills. Just like now.

    I agree fully with you, please tell brenus that. But you have misunderstood i think, i said making unsupported claims and think people to buy into it. I never thought or expect you to believe there is evidence for noahs flood because i say so. That is why i said future thread,.


    Shot down to me means disproved,refuted etc not peoples opinions. You will find with me opinions mean nothing, if all disagree with me i am 100% ok with that, that is not how truth is measured. But if anything of my prevoius op's has been refuted factual, than please show, we know you cant as none has. Successful,no, shot down no.
    “Its been said that when human beings stop believing in god they believe in nothing. The truth is much worse, they believe in anything.” Malcolm maggeridge

    The simple believes every word: but the prudent man looks well to his going. Proverbs -14.15
    The first to present his case seems right,till another comes forward and questions him -Proverbs 18.17

    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
    Genesis 1.1

  21. #21
    Banned Kadagar_AV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    In average 2000m above sea level.
    Posts
    4,176

    Default Re: responding to common objections to bible part 7

    Quote Originally Posted by total relism View Post
    You will find with me opinions mean nothing, if all disagree with me i am 100% ok with that, that is not how truth is measured.
    So basically, you are a fanatic of the most stupid and dangerous kind.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO