responding to common objections to bible part 7

[total relism]

LOL

coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here.

[Sarmatian]

With the possibility of a WW3 upon us, this is probably the worst possible time or the best possible time to discuss religion.

[HoreTore]

coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here.

Sure.

[total relism]

Sure.

coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here. I hope you bring this link up and say you agree with it and its true and you have studied to find out. Otherwise your just showing your accepting of your religion without questioning it and total faith in there theology and inability to question and think for yourself....we shall see.

[HoreTore]

coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here. I hope you bring this link up and say you agree with it and its true and you have studied to find out. Otherwise your just showing your accepting of your religion without questioning it and total faith in there theology and inability to question and think for yourself....we shall see.

....And you hold a degree in one of the hard sciences, I presume?

[Sigurd]

genesis is only true account of creation
Genesis 1:1
1:1 created. No other cosmogony, whether in ancient paganism or modern naturalism, even mentions the absolute origin of the universe. All begin with the space/time/matter universe, already existing in a primeval state of chaos, then attempt to speculate how it might have “evolved” into its present form. Modern evolutionism begins with elementary particles of matter evolving out of nothing in a “big bang” and then developing through natural forces into complex systems. Pagan pantheism also begins with elementary matter in various forms evolving into complex systems by the forces of nature personified as different gods and goddesses. But, very significantly, the concept of the special creation of the universe of space and time itself is found nowhere in all religion or philosophy, ancient or modern, except here in Genesis 1:1.

Woah there M8.
Gen 1:1 is no more than a chapter heading and does in no way identify the universe as its topic. Gen 1:2 is the first Scripture to be considered in the creation story.

[HoreTore]

It's also false in its assertion, of course, as several religions have ex nihilo creation myths.

Here, have an example.



Sometimes I wish I was a christian fundamentalist preacher. It must be awesome to know that you can say whatever nonsense you want, and none of your followers will ever attempt to check the validity of the claims you make.

[Kadagar_AV]

It's also false in its assertion, of course, as several religions have ex nihilo creation myths.

Here, have an example.



Sometimes I wish I was a christian fundamentalist preacher. It must be awesome to know that you can say whatever nonsense you want, and none of your followers will ever attempt to check the validity of the claims you make.

I am glad you repulsed this wish and instead went on to be a teacher for the younger kids.

[total relism]

Woah there M8.
Gen 1:1 is no more than a chapter heading and does in no way identify the universe as its topic. Gen 1:2 is the first Scripture to be considered in the creation story.

interesting, i have never heard that idea before. I do disagree as that would make only genesis of all the book 66 to have as title to it. Not to mention a simple reading of it clearly states heavens and earth and in the beginning, time/space/matter. But the fact being made was time/space/matter and the creation of all three.

It's also false in its assertion, of course, as several religions have ex nihilo creation myths.

Here, have an example.



Sometimes I wish I was a christian fundamentalist preacher. It must be awesome to know that you can say whatever nonsense you want, and none of your followers will ever attempt to check the validity of the claims you make.

please show were it includes time/space/matter being created at once.

as for your comment, me thinks you just say this because you clearly have done so with your last post above,so your trying to draw attention away from it. But if your looking for infallible, i promise me or any pastor has no such ability, and if you can show that i was wrong, i thank you and will edit my op.



edit
i just read i dont see creation of time/space/matter in there at all. Please show me if you believe so.

[Papewaio]

....And you hold a degree in one of the hard sciences, I presume?

There is no plural in hard sciences. As spoketh by the hollowed Dr Rutherford "Physics is the only real science. The rest are just stamp collecting"

And as it has been written it must be so.

[InsaneApache]

coming next thread. You just show your indoctrination here.

Priceless.