responding to common objections to bible part 7

[Kadagar_AV]

while i indeed say yes to a global flood [with large amounts of evidence] i never said it on my op, that is for next thread. So stay tuned.

No way, that's not how things are run here.

You cant make idiotic claims, completely unsupported, and expect people to move on with a vague statement of "future thread".

Your threads SO FAR have been laughed out because of their absurdity, and your lack of understanding when questioned upon them. Is the future thread you talk about of the same quality?

Your style of argumentation is completely idiotic, rinse and repeat and MAYBE I start taking your seriously.

[total relism]

No way, that's not how things are run here.

You cant make idiotic claims, completely unsupported, and expect people to move on with a vague statement of "future thread".

Your threads SO FAR have been laughed out because of their absurdity, and your lack of understanding when questioned upon them. Is the future thread you talk about of the same quality?

Your style of argumentation is completely idiotic, rinse and repeat and MAYBE I start taking your seriously.

sorry you feel that way, but when people say things [no evidence for flood etc] i simply tell them of a future thread coming if they are interested that disagrees with them and can come and talk etc. I think it is a good idea to stay on topic of thread it may be crazy, but that i think is the general idea of having a topic and op of a thread. If things are indeed run different here [please link rules for forum] let me know and i will change.

[Kadagar_AV]

sorry you feel that way, but when people say things [no evidence for flood etc] i simply tell them of a future thread coming if they are interested that disagrees with them and can come and talk etc. I think it is a good idea to stay on topic of thread it may be crazy, but that i think is the general idea of having a topic and op of a thread.

The general idea is to not sprout things out of your behind and expect people buy it.

AGAIN, your last threads have been shot down, argumentatively speaking. So it's not like you have some stellar history that leaves some room for doubt.

On the contrary, people expect to read lunatic ramblings from a madman when opening up your threads. So show the cards you have, or shut up and leave the game.

[Hax]

How does this thread have nine pages?

[total relism]

The general idea is to not sprout things out of your behind and expect people buy it.

AGAIN, your last threads have been shot down, argumentatively speaking. So it's not like you have some stellar history that leaves some room for doubt.

On the contrary, people expect to read lunatic ramblings from a madman when opening up your threads. So show the cards you have, or shut up and leave the game.

The general idea is to not sprout things out of your behind and expect people buy it.


apply to yourself, someone claims no evidence for noahs flood,no global flood, yet does not provide anything for claim. I say there is, that leads us off topic for a future great thread.

The general idea is to not sprout things out of your behind and expect people buy it.
you claim my past threads have been shot down. Please apply here, please show me on any thread [on the thread you claim] were it has been shot down as you baseless claim.

you wont be able to support any of your claims without not responding and ignoring refutations. That is why any claim you make of my threads being shot down, i can just show counter post you ignored or did not read.

The rest is just clear case of you wanting me to shut up, given your history on my threads i dont blame you one bit.

[Brenus]

“i shall enlighten you.” When did I give a date? Copy and paste, you know how to do it.

“The whole Gilgamesh-derivation theory is based on the discredited Documentary Hypothesis. This assumes that the Pentateuch was compiled by priests during the Babylonian Exile in the 6th century BC” You assume I took it from your source, but no, and I assume nothing. I find it all by myself (just reading things and thinking. You should try). Don’t assume what, how and from where others take or reach conclusion, this would be a good start.
Note: To highlight stupidities doesn’t make them realities. A succession of absolutes lies or refusal to recognise archaeological finding doesn’t make a lie true. I gave the dates, proved by sciences, you come-up with verbs.

"I would strongly suggest you get some education before you try to deal with tricky subjects like archeology, history and biology." and others...