Conflicts which may cause World War 3?

[Empire*Of*Media]

despite The Islamic Regime's Corruption and ill-governship in Iran......but what surprised me was this time losing value of Iranian Toman (Rials) Currency against Dollar & Europ & Pound was not because of sanctions or misgovernship of the government. but it was because of UKRAINE"S CRISIS !!!!i was just so much surprised how another country in somewhere in other part of the world can have influence in some other country's People's Life with far far from them. just was because Obama Threated Putin & Russia!! oh my......

ok, so i have one question guys......

since we had Arab so Called Spring (Winter?!!) and many other things, can for example this Ukraine's Crisis be the one of Important Flicks of the next coming World war along with North Korea & South & Japan's Hostility, Armenian & Azerbayjan's Cold War & Hostility, Iran's Threat To the world and his Syria Problem with Russia & China against the West, The Russian & US the Hostility of From Abkhazia of Georgia - to Syria & Ukraine, The Hostility of Japan & China, The Tension and Hate of Pakistan & India very ready to nuke each other, Iraq's Ready somehow to attack Kurdistan of Iraq, Turkey's desire to Invade Kurdistan of Iraq and Syria - in lame excuse To Destroy the People's Freedom Fighters of PKK - YPG - PJAK, the ascending hate of Muslims & Arabs against Israel specially Iran & Hezbullah & Hamas in the other side of Turkey's hate and also Egyptian Extremists and also the willing & wanting of Independent Free Catalan & N.Ireland & Kurdistan & .....................so other problems and Cold Wars. ( i bypassed The African and Latin American Nations!!)

I can say the world is again ready to explode again and start of the world war !! Thats irrefragable but when ........thats the question.

i'd very like to know your Ideas!....

[HoreTore]

I'm sorry to say, but the Turkish response to Kurds will not trigger a world war. It's an irrelevant conflict to the rest of the world.

[Fragony]

Turkey is a nato partner, is way too important for the west. Syria is a nice excuses to place some anti-missile system at the Syrian border, but of course they are really there because of Iran.

[Kagemusha]

Turkey is a nato partner, is way too important for the west. Syria is a nice excuses to place some anti-missile system at the Syrian border, but of course they are really there because of Iran.

And it is absolutely stupid to demonize Iran when they should be the best partner of West in the area like they once were. More we provoke them, more extreme elements take over there, as in many other places as well. We are digging our own graves.

[Empire*Of*Media]

I'm sorry to say, but the Turkish response to Kurds will not trigger a world war. It's an irrelevant conflict to the rest of the world.

no i didnt mean the reason or the matter of starting world war.
i told that is among them to and i said "Flicks" not the ........

[HoreTore]

no i didnt mean the reason or the matter of starting world war.
i told that is among them to and i said "Flicks" not the ........

One of the main drawbacks of using wrong words and bad sentence structure, is that other people do not understand what you mean.

Flicks...?

[The Lurker Below]

oops

[Fragony]

One of the main drawbacks of using wrong words and bad sentence structure, is that other people do not understand what you mean.

Flicks...?

I think he meant 'conflicts'.

[HoreTore]

I think he meant 'conflicts'.

Yes, well.... The number of, and violence of, conflicts in the world is decreasing.

The world actually did get more peaceful at the end of the cold war. The fall of a massive dictatorship armed to the brim with nuclear arms, sponsoring armed groups all over the world led to more peace, whuddathunkit?

[rvg]

The world actually did get more peaceful at the end of the cold war. The fall of a massive dictatorship armed to the brim with nuclear arms, sponsoring armed groups all over the world led to more peace, whuddathunkit?

Well that's about to change.

[HoreTore]

Well that's about to change.

Nah, Obama isn't ready to reveal himself as the Anti-Christ just yet.

[rvg]

Nah, Obama isn't ready to reveal himself as the Anti-Christ just yet.

Sure he is. And he did:

[Empire*Of*Media]

One of the main drawbacks of using wrong words and bad sentence structure, is that other people do not understand what you mean.

Flicks...?

oh please dont tell me that word is wrong!! sorry guys im using a bullshit dictionary and english has extremley meanings and exceptation!!

i think my i meant "fillips "......thats OK ?!
and that decrease was temprary after cold war until US government decided to create world on terror!!

Sure he is. And he did:

lollllllllllllll!!!!!

but i think he not he is himself!! he is to make way for AntiChrist!!

[HoreTore]

oh please dont tell me that word is wrong!! sorry guys im using a bullshit dictionary and english has extremley meanings and exceptation!!

i think my i meant "fillips "......thats OK ?!

Never heard that word before.

and that decrease was temprary after cold war until US government decided to create world on terror!!

Wrong. The number of conflicts have not risen since the end of the cold war. It's been a steady decline since the fall of the USSR. The war on terror didn't stop the decline.

but i think he not he is himself!! he is to make way for AntiChrist!!

See, this is the problem... Debating world affairs with someone who believes in the coming of the Antichrist is....problematic....

[Sarmatian]

Yes, well.... The number of, and violence of, conflicts in the world is decreasing.

The world actually did get more peaceful at the end of the cold war. The fall of a massive dictatorship armed to the brim with nuclear arms, sponsoring armed groups all over the world led to more peace, whuddathunkit?

I do believe it was more of a case of one superbully losing any competition.

[HoreTore]

I do believe it was more of a case of one superbully losing any competition.

....and thus resulting in way fewer conflicts and violence in the world.

[Sarmatian]

....and thus resulting in way fewer conflicts and violence in the world.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc

[HoreTore]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc

You believe the disappearance of hostilities between two superpowers is not the cause of the decline in number of conflicts over the last two decades...?

Pray tell then, what you believe the cause to be.

[rvg]

You believe the disappearance of hostilities between two superpowers is not the cause of the decline in number of conflicts over the last two decades...?

Pray tell then, what you believe the cause to be.

Underpants gnomes.

[HoreTore]

The steady and growing proliferation of nuclear arms.

....And we have had a "steady and growing" number of nuclear arms and nuclear states from roughly the 80's?

Underpants gnomes.

Dang, forgot about those little buggers...

[Empire*Of*Media]

Never heard that word before.

Really !! i meant little or maybe big things to provoke something whats that in Damn English!? (ah yes really damn English!! Loll)

Wrong. The number of conflicts have not risen since the end of the cold war. It's been a steady decline since the fall of the USSR. The war on terror didn't stop the decline.

if you mean between USA & Russia and europe?! yes indeed. but not the rest of the world......

See, this is the problem... Debating world affairs with someone who believes in the coming of the Antichrist is....problematic....

i was JOKING friend!! :d i knew he was joking and then i joked too!! why you see me so negative ?!

[HoreTore]

Ya sure. Pakistan, North Korea, Iran soon. Saudi Arabia and Egypt, nominally. Once the middle east is openly nuked up the wars will stop, watch.

I'd hardly say those states are enough to cause a major decline in world conflict.

[HoreTore]

if you mean between USA & Russia and europe?! yes indeed. but not the rest of the world......

No, I was referring to the entire world.

[Empire*Of*Media]

Ya sure. Pakistan, North Korea, Iran soon. Saudi Arabia and Egypt, nominally. Once the middle east is openly nuked up the wars will stop, watch.

lolllllll indeed!! well north korea & Pakistan is not middle east!!
but please dont Nuke Kurdistan and Armenia! they have nothing to do with the world crisis and terrorism!! indeed they are Victims themselves!

I'd hardly say those states are enough to cause a major decline in world conflict.

the matter is ISRAEL !!

have i forgot USA (Government) even giving his life for them?!.....

[HoreTore]

the matter is ISRAEL !!

Ah yes of course, it's always dem jooooooooooooooooooze who are responsible for all our pain and suffering.

The 1920's called, they want their dead horse back.

[Rhyfelwyr]

One of the main drawbacks of using wrong words and bad sentence structure, is that other people do not understand what you mean.

Flicks...?

I thought for a minute there we had another Bartix thread on our hands...

[Pannonian]

One of the main drawbacks of using wrong words and bad sentence structure, is that other people do not understand what you mean.

Flicks...?

That's where you've got it wrong, when you talk about regions and generalised risks. Easternkurdikus is talking about individual peoples, like those flicking Kurds. If the west get their policies wrong concerning them, we might end up in WWIII. So IMHO it's better to just say, flick them.

[Hax]

But I thought...

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

[Shaka_Khan]

I was thinking of good movie flicks to match the WWIII mood.

[Sarmatian]

You believe the disappearance of hostilities between two superpowers is not the cause of the decline in number of conflicts over the last two decades...?

Pray tell then, what you believe the cause to be.

I agree with that, but based on your original post,

The fall of a massive dictatorship armed to the brim with nuclear arms, sponsoring armed groups all over the world led to more peace, whuddathunkit?

I understood that your position is that USSR was the only one responsible for higher rate of conflicts.