El Barto's Clueless Mafia Game #1

[Ishmael]

All right, I'll bite.

...
Why?

Visorslash: In my experience he doesn't tend to post quite so much, so early, as scum.

TFT: Ruling Pizza townie off the bat. He doesn't tend to read easily. That seems like either overconfidence, or an attempt to get on the good side of one of the more talkative (and therefore potentially influential) players.

Everyone gets it wrong sometimes.

That said, I voted you specifically because I want to read your interactions to me, and you giving me a pass, no matter how tentative is generally not how I find Ishmael to work, at least as town. I remember you voting me more then most people and normally having some sort of voting interaction early.

Thoughts on Pizza so far?

Are you saying that you're scum, or that I always vote for you even when you're townie?

Seriously though, whilst I don't tend to self-analyse much (perhaps I should), if I vote for you more often than others that's because I tend to find you suspicious more often than others, accurately or otherwise. It's not like my default course of action is just 'vote Visorslash.'

As for Pizza, see above; I don't feel justified in making any judgement yet.

Got it.

The AA vote definitely is a vote away from bandwagons since there were a few votes already, but that can be both a villagery or a wolfish behavior depending on the player. Things hadn't gotten underway so if anything, it's a slight wolf read, but overall neutral.

The opening ishmael vote also seems neutral. This post though:


I have to wonder about the deliberate separation between the meta analysis and the post analysis. It feels like you are trying to shift focus off the meta game factor. Might be something to look into.

Well, the meta analysis and post analysis were naturally separate. The meta analysis was of Visor's scumfinding ability, whilst the post analysis was about my opinions on how I might vote. There really wasn't much overlap.