Sure, it's a big no-no here as well. It's very expensive and you can lose your driving priveleges for substantial periods of time. Yet drink-driving accidents and fatalities happen all the time (significantly more than firearms fatalities/injuries).
My point wasn't any particular risky behavior, more to show how broad the issue can grow pretty quickly. "State having a vested interest" gets into a LOT of rights-trampling before you can say "
Kelo v. New London".
Interesting side note: The corporate interest that asked the local government to seize and demolish the housing through emminent domain changed their mind and de-invested in the area. The area is now an abandoned rat's nest littered with construction debris. I raise this point to make the case that Government most certainly does NOT always know what's best.
Bookmarks