Morality

[Viking]

This might sound dumb Viking, but I don't like to attach rigid definitions to be applied to scenarios because that presumes:

A. That morality is simply following a logical flow chart.
B. Morality is knowledge not a skill.

That skill and knowledge (or logic) should be separate things strike me as a false dichotomy. Think of craftsmanship: we can program a robot to recreate even the finest work made by hand. The robot does this by following purely logical routines.

(and of course, whether something sounds dumb is ultimately irrelevant )

I'm sorry if this makes no sense to you, but building moral laws from first principles always results in increasingly odd and counter intuitive consequences or obviously repugnant choices. It's a skill to be practiced in my opinion.

If you encounter repugnant choices, then presumably something is incorrect about your moral theory (as far as this is something undesired).