I don't see what this has to do with logical codes specifically.
Maybe the choices are not repugnant to the author of the theory, or maybe they convinced themselves that the repugnant quality was an illusion they needed to overcome.Can you think of any modern theory (enlightenment until today) that doesn't lead to any repugnant choices?
Maybe the the most popular theories are the simplest ones and therefore are more likely to lead to repugnant choices, as they lack the more complex design a functional moral theory requires.
Bookmarks