Results 1 to 30 of 53

Thread: The Trinity

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: The Trinity

    y'all should learn Koine Greek, Biblical Hebrew, and Palestinian Aramaic before quoting the Bible.

    maybe the translation doesn't work
    This space intentionally left blank.

  2. #2
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: The Trinity

    Quote Originally Posted by Hax View Post
    y'all should learn Koine Greek, Biblical Hebrew, and Palestinian Aramaic before quoting the Bible.

    maybe the translation doesn't work
    If you disagree with my understanding. State the particulars.
    Status Emeritus

  3. #3
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: The Trinity

    No it's just that -- have you ever considered the fact that it's kind of weird that there are really specific points being made (possibly the modern-day equivalent of the supposed "angels dancing on the head of a pin"-debate) but that we're all completely dependent on translations?

    It's like some guy in Korea writing about the ideas brought forth by Mark Twain while relying on a Russian translation, and that times a hundred. How is it actually possible to know what the people writing the Bible thought or meant, because we're practically reliant on translated commentary upon translated commentary (it's totally the same with Biblical and Quranic studies, by the way).
    This space intentionally left blank.

    Members thankful for this post (3):



  4. #4
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: The Trinity

    Quote Originally Posted by Hax View Post
    No it's just that -- have you ever considered the fact that it's kind of weird that there are really specific points being made (possibly the modern-day equivalent of the supposed "angels dancing on the head of a pin"-debate) but that we're all completely dependent on translations?

    It's like some guy in Korea writing about the ideas brought forth by Mark Twain while relying on a Russian translation, and that times a hundred. How is it actually possible to know what the people writing the Bible thought or meant, because we're practically reliant on translated commentary upon translated commentary (it's totally the same with Biblical and Quranic studies, by the way).
    Exactly... but that is the debate on sola scriptura which we wont do here, all though it is related.. as in begging the question to an authoritative record.
    Status Emeritus

  5. #5
    Ranting madman of the .org Senior Member Fly Shoot Champion, Helicopter Champion, Pedestrian Killer Champion, Sharpshooter Champion, NFS Underground Champion Rhyfelwyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    In a hopeless place with no future
    Posts
    8,646

    Default Re: The Trinity

    Sigurd, you take an interesting position. I wasn't quite sure what your views were, and had been expecting perhaps the more modern non-Trinitarian views. Would it be accurate to say that our positions can be summed up something along the lines of:

    Rhyfelwyr:
    1. One essence/nature with one set of attributes, encapsulated fully in three distinct persons.
    2. All three persons are co-equal and co-eternal.
    Sigurd:
    1. Three separate essences/natures which share the same attributes, each encapsulated in three distinct persons.
    2. The Son and Holy Spirit are subordinate to the Father, and were created by him.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hax View Post
    y'all should learn Koine Greek, Biblical Hebrew, and Palestinian Aramaic before quoting the Bible.

    maybe the translation doesn't work
    I think that studying the linguistic arguments surrounding any contested translations is a more practical approach, and good enough for the purpose.
    Last edited by Rhyfelwyr; 10-25-2014 at 19:10.
    At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.

  6. #6
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: The Trinity

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr View Post
    Sigurd, you take an interesting position. I wasn't quite sure what your views were, and had been expecting perhaps the more modern non-Trinitarian views. Would it be accurate to say that our positions can be summed up something along the lines of:

    Rhyfelwyr:
    1. One essence/nature with one set of attributes, encapsulated fully in three distinct persons.
    2. All three persons are co-equal and co-eternal.
    Sigurd:
    1. Three separate essences/natures which share the same attributes, each encapsulated in three distinct persons.
    2. The Son and Holy Spirit are subordinate to the Father, and were created by him.
    The Son is the only begotten, but obviously he partook in the creation. If The Son is a created being, he would have been the first of all created beings.
    You say: One essence/nature with one set of attributes, encapsulated fully in three distinct persons. It is hard to interpret that as anything other than three separate entities.
    Status Emeritus

  7. #7
    Ranting madman of the .org Senior Member Fly Shoot Champion, Helicopter Champion, Pedestrian Killer Champion, Sharpshooter Champion, NFS Underground Champion Rhyfelwyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    In a hopeless place with no future
    Posts
    8,646

    Default Re: The Trinity

    Quote Originally Posted by Sigurd View Post
    The Son is the only begotten, but obviously he partook in the creation. If The Son is a created being, he would have been the first of all created beings.
    You say: One essence/nature with one set of attributes, encapsulated fully in three distinct persons. It is hard to interpret that as anything other than three separate entities.
    The importance difference between us here is surely that whereas you say that Father, Son and Holy Spirit each have their own separate essence/nature, I would say that they all share the same one. In my system, the one essence/nature of God is fully and indivisibly present in each of them. In yours, there are three separate Godly essences/natures, one in each of them. Isn't that what makes your take polytheistic, and mine monotheistic?

    I'm currently preparing a reply to your main response...
    At the end of the day politics is just trash compared to the Gospel.

  8. #8
    Dragonslayer Emeritus Senior Member Sigurd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Norge
    Posts
    6,877

    Default Re: The Trinity

    Quote Originally Posted by Rhyfelwyr View Post
    The importance difference between us here is surely that whereas you say that Father, Son and Holy Spirit each have their own separate essence/nature, I would say that they all share the same one. In my system, the one essence/nature of God is fully and indivisibly present in each of them. In yours, there are three separate Godly essences/natures, one in each of them. Isn't that what makes your take polytheistic, and mine monotheistic?

    I'm currently preparing a reply to your main response...
    It is not polytheistic in the sense that one recognizes the Father as GOD and Christ as subordinate. We worship the same God as he said to Magdalene, your God and mine. The Bible has no problem with identifying other beings as gods. It doesn't make the ancient religion of Israel and Judah any less monotheistic to recognize the divinity of angels and whatnot calling them god.
    Genesis uses a specific wording for God which I kinda wanted to present to Vincent as he brought Genesis to the table.
    Jehovah is not the word used for God, but Elohim, which is a plural form of God, suggesting more than one god participating in the creation. Does it not state: let us make man in our image?
    And it is the same word as used in Psalm 82:6 which is the verse Christ quotes in John 10:34; Ye are Gods (’ănî- ’ā-mar-tî ’ĕ-lō-hîm) compare to Genesis 1:1;
    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth (bə-rê-šîṯ bā-rā ’ĕ-lō-hîm;’êṯ haš-šā-ma-yim wə-’êṯ hā-’ā-reṣ.)
    Status Emeritus

  9. #9
    The Black Senior Member Papewaio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    15,677

    Default Re: The Trinity

    This is all interesting but who created God?

    Or did nothing exist before Him and then he sprung into being whole?
    Our genes maybe in the basement but it does not stop us chosing our point of view from the top.
    Quote Originally Posted by Louis VI the Fat
    Pape for global overlord!!
    Quote Originally Posted by English assassin
    Squid sources report that scientists taste "sort of like chicken"
    Quote Originally Posted by frogbeastegg View Post
    The rest is either as average as advertised or, in the case of the missionary, disappointing.

    Member thankful for this post:

    Beskar 


  10. #10
    Member Member Hax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    5,352

    Default Re: The Trinity

    And it is the same word as used in Psalm 82:6 which is the verse Christ quotes in John 10:34; Ye are Gods (’ănî- ’ā-mar-tî ’ĕ-lō-hîm) compare to Genesis 1:1;
    In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth (bə-rê-šîṯ bā-rā ’ĕ-lō-hîm;’êṯ haš-šā-ma-yim wə-’êṯ hā-’ā-reṣ.)
    This space intentionally left blank.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO