Ukraine Thread

[Gilrandir]

Well, export of socialist revolution has been in debate, Stalin vs Lenin, or Trotsky, but was not part of the ideology.

You make claims which must be grouded on your more than cursory awareness of the communist ideology in its enirety. The latter is not limited to the Manifesto. It is the first (AFAIK), but not the last expounding (and interpretation) of it. As I have said, others of more practical set of mind developed the ideas of the Manifesto or introduced their own. So the idea of exporting revolution was introduced later into the ideology.
https://www.marxists.org/archive/pea.../08/export.htm

The first official Communist Part is around the 1920.

In name, perhaps. But not in essence. Bosheviks were steering by the ideology since about 1900 (too lazy to find the exact date) when their party was called RSDRP (b).

You can’t be a Nazi without conquest, racism and brutality.

Le Pen manages to thrive without the first and, by and large, without the third. There are civilized nazis now.

Communist ideology does not propose the superiority of one social group (this is more the Aristocratic/Conservative/Tories approach). It recognises a struggle between the (roughly) two classes and describe that the oppression couldn’t stop without struggle. As much I remember, the ideology never mentioned annihilation of class enemies, but the infamous dictatorship of the proletariat which will end when everyone will be equal…
Yeah, I know… But there is no appeal to genocide as the Nazi ideology.

To genocide - no. To classocide - yes.
https://books.google.com.ua/books?id...20class&f=true
Page 116, the second sentence in the second paragraph, starting with "The bourgeoisie wouldbe removed as a class".
And other quotations by the classics:
http://www.paulbogdanor.com/left/communists.html