It is good to know that you do, though. During my short sojourn on this forum I have seen you only once link an openly biased article, now was the time for the second. A tendency?
If you knew its nature than you had "an agenda" (as you like to call it) posting it. I can't see no other reason of it except an attempt to appear to sound more persuasive through linking several (instead of one) article and creating an effect "you see, so many sources corroborate what I claim". Nice try.
Bookmarks