Quote Originally Posted by Tuuvi View Post
Would you care to explain what's wrong with Tiaexz's argument? I'm not smart enough to figure it out myself.
Put simply, he's arguing against a far more primitive version of God than Rhy is proposing, Rhy described an Omniscient, Omnipresent and Omnipotent being, whist Tiaexz addressed the question of a "Massively Powerful Being" which would be an infinitely less potent entity. Then he starts waffling on about meatballs, an absurd an childish argument of a type abandoned by Christian theologians and scientists even before Isaac Newton.

Conversely, Kadagar raised some rather more difficult questions about a specifically Christian God without pretending that it proves there is no God at all.

You see it's two separate questions - the Almighty God and what people call the "personal God".