Put simply, he's arguing against a far more primitive version of God than Rhy is proposing, Rhy described an Omniscient, Omnipresent and Omnipotent being, whist Tiaexz addressed the question of a "Massively Powerful Being" which would be an infinitely less potent entity. Then he starts waffling on about meatballs, an absurd an childish argument of a type abandoned by Christian theologians and scientists even before Isaac Newton.
Conversely, Kadagar raised some rather more difficult questions about a specifically Christian God without pretending that it proves there is no God at all.
You see it's two separate questions - the Almighty God and what people call the "personal God".
Bookmarks