Quote Originally Posted by Philipvs Vallindervs Calicvla View Post
Right, so you didn't get the OP, you just demonstrated that.
How did I not 'get' the OP?

It is an argument for the case of a creator, and by extension, the Abrahamic-style Personal God.
I have argued that there doesn't need to be a creator, which interrupts the underlying assumptions and furthered it by suggesting even if we follow the limited amount of assumptions, it doesn't mean it is the Abrahamic-style God either.