I'm not sure if I understand the point of this debate. It seems like this argument solves nothing, and has no answer. So what's the point in discussion? Is to convert others to a specific belief system? Belief is exactly what it is. Belief. I read a lot of religious texts, not to find god, but to better myself. I subscribe to the notion that all texts were written by humans, with a purpose. I try to attain as much wisdom as I can from such texts, without believing in it word-for-word. It's a fairy tale to me, a fantastical story with a message. From what I've read so far, I feel like polytheistic beliefs have more meaningful texts. Each deity is associated with a specific attribute, be it virtue, courage, truth, wisdom etc. They are not complete beings, often displaying negative attributes as well, such as hubris, greed, arrogance etc. I feel like this is contrast with a monotheistic belief, where only one god is perfect and has no faults. I just can't relate to such a being. Everyone has their faults, and I try my best to rectify them. Having a deity with no faults to begin with doesn't show me the power of transformation. Instead, it shows me a finished product, with no means of attaining it.
I don't really understand this conversion herd mentality. Why does it matter if someone believes in something different? Is it hard to accept people are different? I actually prefer it, makes things more interesting. This aspect doesn't only apply to religion. I see it everywhere; Xbox vs Playstation, sporting teams, political affiliations. Who cares? Just live your life to your fullest.
Bookmarks