I deliberately started a new campaign (as Qart'Hadasht, hehe, must be my 10th EB 2 campaign with them already, I simply love their government system and units).
I played very defensively, allied with the Massylians, Luso, Arverni and Makedons, didn't even try to defend/save Alalia when the Romans came for it (oddly enough they never seem to come for Nora after that) and in general just sat there building up my little trade empire and hit "toggle_fow" ever so often.
The changes made to the EDU seem not to alter the campaign balance (which was what I wanted to see and what made me start a campaign at all). I spent the whole thursday on this campaign and am at turn 253 now. I saw nothing that I never saw before (except perhaps the Ptolemaioi grabbing Sardis from the AS early on).
So the (still rudimentary, I know) campaign balance is not affected.
Of course I played a battle or two with the Carthaginian units, too.
I stood away from the (macedonian) phalanx units.
The skirmishers behave as they always do since your "unofficial" fix - almost perfectly. The only problem they have is that they aren't retreating fast enough (they never did since the release of EB 2.0). I'm not sure if this is intentional, it's not a big problem for me, though, as I tend to use at least half of my skirmisher units as bait for the enemy cavalry anyway.
The higher cavalry speed doesn't help avoiding the horses, too. You were absolutely right about the Numidians, by the way.
This higher speed makes it very much essential to have your own light cavalry wings, since the heavier cavalry can't even nearly move quickly enough to prevent them from (for example) get around your flanks, obliterate your archers and retreat again. Frightening! (And fascinating at the same time.)
Oh: still no crashes for me, despite the consistency issues you mentioned.![]()
Bookmarks