“It is so inspiring! Especially from the one who more than once claimed that, in fact, NATO armies (including the French one) were doing anything but defending freedom or democracy.” Who? If you claim that it is my position, you surely had problem in reading text (or understanding).

“Sometimes it does.” And sometimes it doesn’t, as placebo effect does.

“Do you blame cars in accidents?” You should more about Car’s company blamed for accidents due to a default. So, yes, when a car is involved in an accident, we can blame the car. Then, do you deny the car was part of the problem, or you just pretend that it nothing to do with the car, as the killer had been on foot, it would have been the same result?

“And if a person killed someone with a knife, must we blame the knife since it definitely has some relation to the murder?” Who spoke of blaming game, excepted you? Yes, if I kill someone with a knife, and if this knife was designed to kill, yes, the knife is part of it: without the knife I can’t stab someone. I may strangle him/her, but I can’t stab. So, what is the part you still don’t understand?

“The USSR almost banned religion” Never, that is legend: From Wiki: “The main religions of pre-revolutionary Russia persisted throughout the entire Soviet period, but they were only tolerated within certain limits. Generally, this meant that believers were free to worship in private and in their respective religious buildings (churches, mosques, etc.), but public displays of religion outside of such designated areas were prohibited.”

“Forgetting the time frame you confuse cause and consequence” ? What are you talking about? Cause and Consequence? Stalinism is not a Consequence of Marxism, but the consequence of Russian Revolution. However, Marxism is part of Stalinism as Stalin shared, or embraced, the Marxist way of thinking

You should really make effort to read and understand instead to knee-jerk reaction at everything I write. Well, perhaps it too much to ask…