That's exactly what I said, "completely unique in being a violent religion" was meant as "more violent than other religions" which is close enough to "extremely over represented when it comes to terrorism", apart from that I already said that: "Maybe it wasn't perfectly worded either [...]". You're making a huge deal over a small semantic issue if there even is one, but at least you're only derailing your own thread with it...
I have been aware of that for a while now as I have explained in previous answers to you and by acknowledging the things you said, as quoted in my last reply to you. I get the impression that you do not read my posts properly and then accuse me of not getting you. I have explained that I get you several times now, I'm not going to repeat it. Go back and read what I said! You're the one who creates unique distinctions that most people don't use in the same way and even when I try to agree with you on your very own linguistic terms you constantly accuse me of not getting it, so what part of "I agree" do you not get???
Bookmarks