I'd like to correct this part:

Originally Posted by
Sir Moody
Who exactly is calling for censorship?
Anita isn't, Ironside isn't, I am not and I haven't seen Sarmatian calling for it either (unless I am misreading him).
I must congratulate sarkeesian for not taking the suicidal route and going to the courts, using shame to coerce the consumers to stop buying games they like is a big step up in effective agenda pushing. A different method does not change the same lack of credibility.
I think I got a bit carried away there.
She isnt and you arent, these guys are:
Sarkeesian's ideas are unsubstantial and rather counterproductive as I explained but they are being used by these guys to shame and coerce the consumers to stop buying games this group doesnt like.
Sarkeesian is like ayn rand, her ideas are unsubstantiated and imo wrong, but they're just an opinion. However like rand she gains ire she doesnt deserve (including mine, sadly) due to others using thier ideas to justify deplorable behavior, like Ayn Rand is used to justify tax dodging these are used to shame men for likeing juvinile materiel they are painting as sexist.
Now, as to why the gaming news websites exhibited are being so blatant about their agenda, that comes down to gamergate and another discussion altogether.
Bookmarks