Stupid me.
Reading your answer I first wondered what you are apologizing for, then I re-read my words which you quoted .... and now I feel the need to apologize myself.
That statement about the "incomplete feel" of some factions was not meant as a complaint in any way, not at all. I'm dearly sorry if it came over as such.
What I tried to say was that the Sab'yn lack access to some of the units (like the Red Sea axemen or some cavarly other than the Horse Archers - the awesome Ethiopian Cavalry for example) that were pretty crucial for any Sab'yn campaign in EB I.
"a faction that feels incomplete" is therefore a wrong term - I should have said "a faction that lacks crucial units in my personal opinion", especially since the units/the battles are - while being an important part of any TW game - not necessary the decisive part when it comes to how a factions feels to play.
Sab'yn are - together with Hayasdan and Carthage - actually my favourite faction in EB 2 so far (same as in EB 1).
I thought that my following words "(they are a lot of fun nevertheless!)" had made clear that my intent was not to discard any of the effort and love to detail that went into the arabian factions.
Well, in the future I shall re-read twice instead of once before posting. Bloody stupid language barrier!
EDIT: Thank you for the hints about the future releases. Interesting stuff.
EDIT 2: A camel unit! Gods, I can't express how much I'm looking forward to such!
Bookmarks