Last edited by Greyblades; 06-23-2015 at 22:33.
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
So police in one city in the world were bad against blacks...
Yeah, now I totally see why we would get blacks off of common decent behaviour
On a further note...
I don't mind the police targeting blacks more, when the blacks commit more crime...
Say that you have a population of a hundred blacks, and a hundred whites...
Of the whites 2/100 will commit serious crimes.
Of the blacks 10/100 will commit serious crimes.
Shouldn't the police then spend 5 times as much effort on monitoring the black population? At least this is the problem in Sweden... When the police target crime ridden groups, they get hit with the racism-card at once.
As an example, recently the police where found having a register of our gypsies explaining family ties, close connections and so on... The police were hit HARD because of racism...
Nevermind that the gypsies here is ALL ABOUT parasitizing on the host society...
Of course they should be targeted, they are a cancer in an orderly society!!
![]()
![]()
"Topic is tired and needs a nap." - Tosa Inu
Last edited by Greyblades; 06-23-2015 at 23:55.
Why don't you?
I can once again point to a myriad of evidence of blacks being more stupid than whites, or east asians... Can you find anything, like any research at all, that would confirm that blacks are just as intelligent as east asians - or even whites?
Police probably are more focused on blacks in most cities, to be honest.Use common sense, it's not just happening in one city.
Now, is that because of racism or because of genetical / cultural differences? You have some sort of for you politically correct way of looking at this, it seems...
But where are the facts?
FACT 1: Blacks from poor countries tend to do really, really bad in western societies...
Fact 2: East Asians from poor countries tend to do really well in western societies...
Want to explain "socioeconomic factors" again? Puh-Leeze...
Some are smart, some or dumb. That's just the way the world is![]()
I suppose I have been meandering around my point for too long. The South has always been burdened with a disproportionate amount of American sin. The American flag flew over slaves, Imperialism, and genocide. Union commanders went on to massacre Indians in the west less than decade after the war. Outside of a few abolitionists, everyone was a frothing at the mouth racist. Racism was just as bad in the north through the civil rights movement, look at the Boston bus riots or MLK jr's attempts to organize the black population of Chicago.
So, Why is the American flag any different than the battle flag one? Maybe it represents hope, that is what I like to think. The flag represents all of our past sins but also all of our hopes and dreams. The flags past can not change, but its future has to be molded. The battle flag on the other hand remains stagnant, an ugly relic of a shameful and calamitous past. However, on some of my grumpier days I think the deference to the flag may be more of the product of might makes right. It sits on top if only because it is the victor.
I know Dylan Roofs family were German immigrants whom came here after the war. I know he shares a kinship with apartheid era Rhodesia and South Africa something that has nothing to do with America. His manifesto looks like a rip off of common neo nazi tropes that can be found all over the internet. He does not care about this land, only his warped views of hierarchy based on melanin content. So everyone from Amazon to Wal-mart will shake their finger and get kudos for taking away merchandise but nothing will change.
We won't talk about why another American decided to act out in a mass shooting. We won't have a frank discussion about race. We won't even broach the subject of angry young men being seduced be delusional ideas. We will simply pin it on the battle flag and the south, while the seat gets a little heavier as more sin is added to it.
Edit: I don't even like the flag. I am a dyed in the wool Federalist and small "r" republican. My family were unionists and I am immensely proud of that fact. I recognize one flag. I consider the battle flag treason.
Edit 2: There seems to be some confusion as to who his ancestors actually were. I'll leave mypost for now but change it if something comes up
Last edited by Strike For The South; 06-24-2015 at 04:25.
There, but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford
My aim, then, was to whip the rebels, to humble their pride, to follow them to their inmost recesses, and make them fear and dread us. Fear is the beginning of wisdom.
I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation.
Bookmarks