For those who don't remember, here is the original case on GH:
*He threw a very gentle vote at Visor right at the start of D1, an obvious vote placed where it was least likely to generate suspicion.
*He then contacted Visor in private to tell him that the vote was only temporary, for which there is no townie justification yet stated.
*Once other people had posted more substantive and provocative cases for lynching Visor, GH switched his vote to BSmith, who was already shaping up to be the game's #1 non-Visor lynch bait.
*He then went on to claim that his accusation of Visor was just 'fishing for responses', which is deeply unconvincing, given how hedged and unprovocative his case was.
To all that, we can now add:
*He's offered only a handwaving defence to the above, apparently hoping that the matter will just fade away.
*He skipped his vote yesterday, and choose to hop on khaan's paper thin case against me today. Where's the scumhunting?
Bookmarks