I'm hosting a game!

[Winston Hughes]

You were quite rarin' to go on D1 and were quite on board with the Visor lynch. You 'bailed' off it and then switched back later, allegedly to stop a townie lynch, but your phrasing of "has to be" seems very off to me if that was indeed your goal.

What? That makes no sense at all. The words 'has to be' indicate precisely what I was thinking: that there was no better viable lynch.

Since then, you've simply sat on voting for GH without really putting much explanation into it, a tactic I've used myself plenty of times as mafia. It makes you seem less random and like you actually have a goal when you really just want to toss a vote somewhere so people won't accost you.

Again, what? No explanation? The reasons behind my vote have been stated more thoroughly and more clearly than any other vote around right now. The reason I've not continued to explain it is because everyone already knows it, and GH has offered only a handwave of a defence to what was said before. I could restate it all, but what's the point if he's not going to engage?

Anyway, khaan's logic on Winston looks pretty solid and I agree that the tactic mentioned is something I've done in the past as well. Therefore:

Vote: Winston

I'm not going to defend myself over my D1 actions any further, fyi, as I believe the argument's been played out and nothing new will be added.

Voting for me on khaan's logic - that I'm just parking my vote without further discussion - whilst refusing further discussion on the subject?

If you're not scum, I have no idea what you've been trying to do in this game.