How's that, then?
How's that, then?
The combination of a vote without any real reason evident, on a person who has made a controversial claim leaves open the possibility that you were looking to slip onto the bandwagon without having to attract too much notice. At the very least it would be nice if you could elaborate if you're voting for Visor because you think his claim is scummy (e.g. GH, landlubber), because you think he'll be an ongoing distraction otherwise (e.g. Montmorency), or for a third reason.
Plus, having looked over landlubber's posts he seems sincere. I would have moved my vote off him sometime today anyway.
EDIT: And of course, the host removed the suggestion to vote from you between the sign-ups player list and the game start player list. Clearly that's a subtle hint that he doesn't want his mafia killed off too soon. johnhughthom, you're next.
Last edited by Ishmael; 08-04-2015 at 13:07.
Okay, that's a decent enough explanation. What you suspect is pretty much the mirror opposite of how I actually play the game, but you're not to know that.
The reason for my vote is that I think Visor's claim is very boring, but only if it's true. At this stage, that's all I'm going to say on the matter. There's a long time left until the end of day.
I agree completely. I wish I was a vanilla townie. Being a survivor is fun in the sense that I have to manage town to not fear/paranoia lynch me and mafia not to kill me but it sorta takes the fun out that I don't have to solve the game.
But I signed up to play and I like solving games so I will be attempting to find out who the mafia is.
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...ame-signups%21
https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showt...a-Game-1/page7
Last two games on here that I randed mafia.
A much different approach.
Bookmarks