
Originally Posted by
Ishmael
The combination of a vote without any real reason evident, on a person who has made a controversial claim leaves open the possibility that you were looking to slip onto the bandwagon without having to attract too much notice. At the very least it would be nice if you could elaborate if you're voting for Visor because you think his claim is scummy (e.g. GH, landlubber), because you think he'll be an ongoing distraction otherwise (e.g. Montmorency), or for a third reason.
Bookmarks