I'm hosting a game!

**GeneralHankerchief** · 08-07-2015, 20:38

"Private dealings"

Here's the extent of my communication with Visorslash from the first day phase:

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

Originally Posted by Visorslash

Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief

I'm not keeping my vote on you long-term, just fishing for responses.

GH

Aye I'm sure. You're too good of a player to actually think I'm scum here lol.

Maybe in the past. Don't think that's still the case. But yeah, logically it just doesn't make sense. Probably.

Time to get trollier with my logic.

Honestly I thought we had put the issue of Visor's identity to bed when it was revealed yesterday, but apparently not.

**Csargo** · 08-07-2015, 22:32

What was the point? I don't understand at all.

**GeneralHankerchief** · 08-07-2015, 22:47

I wanted a D1 that was something besides 11 random votes for a change. Visor got the ball rolling, I wanted to keep it going.

**Csargo** · 08-07-2015, 22:51

I mean why did you contact him? I can understand why you put the vote on him initially. I don't understand the PM.

**Winston Hughes** · 08-07-2015, 22:57

Originally Posted by Csargo

I mean why did you contact him? I can understand why you put the vote on him initially. I don't understand the PM.

**GeneralHankerchief** · 08-08-2015, 00:21

It made sense at the time?

**GeneralHankerchief** · 08-08-2015, 00:23

Look, I don't have a better defense than the above. I haven't played a single game of mafia in nearly three years, I'm not exactly running at peak efficiency here. If you hold me to the same standard as you did in the glory days you're going to be sorely disappointed.

**Winston Hughes** · 08-07-2015, 22:53

But, GH, why tell him you weren't planning keeping your vote on him?

I'm struggling to think of a townie reason for doing so. By contrast, it's obvious why scum might want to cozy up to him.

Also, this 'fishing for responses' thing... People were always going to react to Visor's claim. It was the only thing anyone had to talk about. It's notable that the rest of us who pushed on Visor all provoked a response (indeed, I think every one of us caught a vote as a direct consequence), but your accusation got nothing at all until you retracted it. Looking back, it's not hard to see why. Far from demanding a reaction, your accusation was so hedged it would be hard to pick any solid point to address from it. At the time, it looked townie enough. But that's the idea, isn't it? Only when you tell me it's supposed to be provocative does it stop making sense.