Did you really have to respond so quickly GH? My typing fingers are about to fall off! At any rate, this will have to be my last response for a little while, although I should be able to get in again sometime tonight.
I might not have been clear enough here. My vote was not random in the sense that it was picked from an RNG. Rather, I picked 'at random' somebody who I could justify a vote for with more than just "vote: x, because random," which happened to be landlubber. Hence, pseudo-random.
I think this might once again be a point of communication. Part 1 of the statement, as you put it, is not "I didn't find you suspicious," (which is equivalent to "I found you to not be suspicious") but rather "I didn't find you to be actively suspicious" (in response to the suggestion that I did find you actively suspicious, and therefore being equivalent to saying "I have a neutral read on you"). Part 2 was intended to be read as "your posting style was in line with what I perceived to be extremely dangerous behavior if you were mafia and I decided to keep an eye on you," which obviously changes the tone of the statement. Part 3 is consistent with my intent.
Semantics, I know, but I think it's important here.
I obviously disagree with this interpretation. In all my posts this game I have stated my opinions of people as they stand. I'm not going to pretend certainty on a read when it's only tentative, and I'm not going to hedge my bets when I am truly confident about someone.
Witness, for example, my posts in D3. In the evening my time I observe that I don't find 'khaan to be the most scummy person around. The next morning, after rereading the thread, I change my mind and label him the most scummy. That doesn't square with your accusation that I've been 'leaving myself a way out' in an effort to maintain consistency.
I think it is highly probable that if 'khaan is scum, you are his partner. Furthermore, I believe that it is a moot point if you aren't, since in that case the mafia are guaranteed a win.
From memory I think I've brought it up twice, and addressing different parts of the post each time. With that said my comment in question was somewhat tongue in cheek. I was considering using theemoticon to make that more clear, but I've been trying to cut back on it.
I made my thoughts on the situation known in each case. I must admit it's not my first instinct to go barging into an ongoing debate - that's probably something I should work on when playing Mafia.
Okay, that's me done for now. As I say, I'll try to be back sometime later this evening.
Bookmarks