It's easy to get confused when you set out to be confused in order to win an argument.
1. PVC said that the devout Islamists, long championed by liberals as the opposite of the conservative Christians, actually has more in common with the far right than with the left.
2. AFAICS you then argued that it's no surprise that religions that stretch back before the existence of a left should be distinctly rightist.
3. I then pointed out that the British left has its roots in the CofE, which both stretches back before the existence of a left, yet has been distinctly leftist in the past couple of hundred years (when the left did exist).
Are you still confused? Do you want me to further break down these bullet points?
Bookmarks