IMMIGRATION thread

[Viking]

You seem to have difficulties understanding the difference between evidence and a hypothesis.

Nothing of that is proven (even today, and the article is from 2011). It is based on a testimony of a (brace yourself) one, single inmate who admitted he didn't see a single man being shot.

Then a mass grave was found, which was supposed to hold the remains of those 1270 people (the bones showed in the picture). DNA testing showed it was animal bones.

The topic was not Abu Salim, but indiscriminate killing by the regime. You can find two people in that article who do not know where one of their relatives ended up - relatives who were imprisoned. Chances are that they were killed during imprisonment. And yes, those are pieces of evidence, until invalidated.

This makes no sense whatsoever.

Explain yourself.