“But you apply the same logics that was used in the USSR after WWII” I love your obsession for USSR.
I didn’t know that USSR and Lenin was in favour of Free-Market Economy, which is an important part of my sentence, but there you go…
As usual you didn’t read the text.
Now, you are the one using “URSS” communist rhetoric, mixing-up “foreign powers” and “international capitalists”. Not really what I wrote, but your interpretation(s) of texts is always revealing…
“Having governments down is another thing Marxists enjoy” I NEW it!!! USA and EU are full of Marxists. How many governments theses two have put down now? And of course, in Ukraine, you were so respectful of democracy that you put down your elected President, you, as much as I remember, proudly telling as you supported them… All these Nazi are Marxists in disguise, I am telling you!!!
“Why are you then so negative about Ukrainians throwing down their government?” Hey, I am against Nazi, remember? I was all in favour, and I said it, of anti-corruption, fight for jobs and protection of pension demonstrations. But a Nazi-extreme right coup political coup, followed by attempt of political and ethnic cleansing? Without my approval, not that it really matter what I think anyway…
“This is exactly in your line of modus operandi.” Where did I even suggest this? That is pure and blatant propaganda. My line of action is within a democratic revolution by votes.
“Otherwise your statement is empty.” You should really pay attention of what people wrote, and not what you think people wrote: same way is not same thing. Or do you deny the denying of democratic referendum results by the EU? The fact that decisions are taken by un-elected bodies?
“This news is one year old” And? It is not true? Putin annexed Crimea more than one year ago, and you are still up-set about it.
“What does all of this have to do with traitors?” Nothing, two different lines of approach. Can you not multi-task and not able to deal with more than one subject? This one was more how EU and US put their pawns in place…
“locals are prone to be engaged by some "magnate" to promote his interests or to be personally interested (through having their own business) in directing policies of a governmental body according to their schemes.” Yeap, that is called “lobbying” in Western Countries, “Corruption” in the rest of the world.
Bookmarks